asymmetry   145

« earlier    

Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?
there might be those on the more jaded side who would argue that if we went extinct there would be no loss, because there would be no one for whom it would be a loss not to have access to those things. I think this objection misunderstands our relation to these practices. We appreciate and often participate in such practices because we believe they are good to be involved in, because we find them to be worthwhile. It is the goodness of the practices and the experiences that draw us. Therefore, it would be a loss to the world if those practices and experiences ceased to exist.

One could press the objection here by saying that it would only be a loss from a human viewpoint, and that that viewpoint would no longer exist if we went extinct. This is true. But this entire set of reflections is taking place from a human viewpoint. We cannot ask the questions we are asking here without situating them within the human practice of philosophy. Even to ask the question of whether it would be a tragedy if humans were to disappear from the face of the planet requires a normative framework that is restricted to human beings.

Let’s turn, then, and take the question from the other side, the side of those who think that human extinction would be both a tragedy and overall a bad thing. Doesn’t the existence of those practices outweigh the harm we bring to the environment and the animals within it? Don’t they justify the continued existence of our species, even granting the suffering we bring to so many nonhuman lives?

To address that question, let us ask another one. How many human lives would it be worth sacrificing to preserve the existence of Shakespeare’s works? If we were required to engage in human sacrifice in order to save his works from eradication, how many humans would be too many? For my own part, I think the answer is one. One human life would be too many (or, to prevent quibbling, one innocent human life), at least to my mind. Whatever the number, though, it is going to be quite low.

Or suppose a terrorist planted a bomb in the Louvre and the first responders had to choose between saving several people in the museum and saving the art. How many of us would seriously consider saving the art?

So, then, how much suffering and death of nonhuman life would we be willing to countenance to save Shakespeare, our sciences and so forth? Unless we believe there is such a profound moral gap between the status of human and nonhuman animals, whatever reasonable answer we come up with will be well surpassed by the harm and suffering we inflict upon animals. There is just too much torment wreaked upon too many animals and too certain a prospect that this is going to continue and probably increase; it would overwhelm anything we might place on the other side of the ledger. Moreover, those among us who believe that there is such a gap should perhaps become more familiar with the richness of lives of many of our conscious fellow creatures. Our own science is revealing that richness to us, ironically giving us a reason to eliminate it along with our own continued existence.

One might ask here whether, given this view, it would also be a good thing for those of us who are currently here to end our lives in order to prevent further animal suffering. Although I do not have a final answer to this question, we should recognize that the case of future humans is very different from the case of currently existing humans. To demand of currently existing humans that they should end their lives would introduce significant suffering among those who have much to lose by dying. In contrast, preventing future humans from existing does not introduce such suffering, since those human beings will not exist and therefore not have lives to sacrifice. The two situations, then, are not analogous.
asymmetry  suffering  human  extinction  utilitarianism 
december 2018 by ernie.bornheimer
EBay Arbitrage and Airline Competition - Bloomberg
This is about noticing a perfectly sensible market with one price, and then creating your own, different price in a slightly different market, hoping that no one will notice. Arbitrage makes markets more efficient. This makes them more annoying.
finance  ebay  amazon  asymmetry  read 
may 2017 by zhumink

« earlier    

related tags

2005  2009  2013  2015  2016  2017  2018  2cdo  2csra  3d_printing  a  abramson  abundance  accountability  achirality  acqui-hire  acquihire  acquisition  activism  activity  advertising  advice  aerial  aerospace  ageism  aircraft  airplane  algorithm  alibaba  amanda  amazon  ambientintimacy  ambiguity  american  amsterdam  analog  anatomy  and  ann  annielowrey  another  anthropology  antispam  appropriation  architecture  ariely  art  artatoz  artifact  artwork  assemblage  astrophysics  asymmetircal  asymmetric  asymmetrical_eyes  asynchronous  attack  austerity  author:samknight  automation  automaton  aversion  balance  bandwidth  banking  beauty  behavior  behavioral  behaviours  being  betrayal  beyonce  beyond  bias  bicameral  binary  blackbox  blockchain  blog  blue-collar  blue  blur  boardmeeting  boardroom  body  bombing  book  bookshop  boomerang  border  boxes  brain  brogrammer  brunolatour  bubble  building  bullshit  busfactor  business  bw  camouflage  campus  capital  capitalism  career  cars  ceiling  change  cheat  chemistry  chiaroscuro  childhood  chinese  chiral  chirality  chromatic  cities  citizen  clockwise  close  cognitive  coldwar  colonialism  communication  community  compensation  competition  complexity  computing  conceal  concepts  conflict  conforming  consciousness  consent  consequences  constitution  consumer  contextcollapse  contingent  contradiction  control  convenience  conversion  corporate  corporatism  corruption  coryarcangel  costolo  counterclockwise  cowboy  creativity  crisis  criticism  critique  crony  crowdsourcing  csrblogcomment  culture  daisy  dallastx  dan  data  databrokers  datamining  dc:creator=hirsttony  dctagged  death  debate  debugger  decay  deception  defense  deloitte  demand  deschooling  design  developer  development  device  dick  dickfights  digital  diplomacy  discrimination  disparity  dispersion  disposition  dissimulation  diversity  donnaharaway  drama  drone  dust  earth  ebay  economics  economy  education  educational  educationministry  eerie  effect  eflux  eidos  eisenman.nicole  emergent  emissary  emotion  emotions  employment  emptiness  encoded  endomilitarization  enemy  energy  engagement  engineer  engineering  entertainment  entitlement  entrepreneur  entrepreneurship  environment  equal  equality  essence  essential  ethics  eu  euro  everyday  everywhere  evolution  example  exception  experian  expertise  experts  expression  extinction  eyalweizman  face  facebook  failure  fear  feeling  female  feminism  feminist  ferry  fettywap  field  filter  finance  fishkin  fission  flower  fly  fog  follow  forensicarchitecture  forerunner  found  founder  fourfold  frank  frauenbild  frauenfeindlich  frictionless  friend  friends  future  gallop  game-theory  gamedev  games  gap  gender-based  gender  gendered  generational  generationy  genetics  geometric  german  germany  ghetto  gish  github  glass  global  globalvillage  god  google  gop  governance  government  gowen  grahamharman  grand  grooming  guardian  gut  gvb  handedness  handsmath  harassment  hardball  helix  hemisphere  hierarchy  higher  hisotry  hollywood  honeydoc  honeydocument  honeytoken  horvath  hr  hubris  human  humanresources  hypercamouflage  iainmcgilchrist  iancheng  identity  image  imagination  implosion  in  income  indispensable  individual  industrial  industry  inequality  information  input  insect  inspiration  institutions  intelligence  interesting  interior  internal  international  internet  internetofthings  intolerance  inversion  invisible  ip  irreplaceable  j.a.  jill  job  jobmarket  jock  john  jpmorgan  jprangaswami  juancole  judgement  julie  just  kevin  kevinmarks  key  knot  knowledge  knox  label  labels  labor  lacuna  language  lara  launch  law  lawrenceabuhamdan  layout  leadership  legal  lgbt  lgbtq  life  lifehacker  lifehacks  lifelessons  light  lightechoes  lineprofiles  linkeddata  lipstick  liquidity  logging  london  love  lurking  machine  male  management  marc  marketing  markets  marriage  martha  martinheidigger  masculinity  mask  masks  master  maudefrancis  meaning  mechanical  media  mentalhealth  metabolism  metadate  metaphor  metaphysics  military  millennials  mimicry  mind  minorities  minority  minorityrule  mirror  misogynie  misogynistic  misogyny  mobility  mobiusstrip  monetarypolicy  money  monitoring  monuments  monumentsofdallas  moral  mortal  movement  multitude  muscles  museum  music  mutual  mystery  naturalselection  necropolitics  neoliberal  net  netart  network  networks  neuroscience  new  newscientist  newyork  nietzsche  nnt  non-conforming  norms  nussbaum  nyt  nytimes  object  odug  of  olialialina  oneway  online  onmyway  ooo  opendata  openness  operations  opfer  opinion  opportunity  organization  origin  other  output  painting  paradox  parenting  particle  patriarchy  pay  peace  people  perception  perpetual  personalization  pervasive  phatic  philipkdick  philosophy  photog  photography  physics  pinkstinks  plane  plasticity  play  pluralistic  podemo  poetry  policing  policy  politeness  politics  popper  popular  portrait  posen  postmodern  poverty  power  pr  precrime  prediction  predictive  prejudice  presentation  principles  privacy  privatesector  privatisation  privilege  privileged  products  projection  property  prostheric  prosthetics  proton  psychology  public  publicrelations  publics  publicsector  purchasing-power  q4  quality  quantum  queer  race  racism  rant  read  reality  recession  reciprocal  recommendations  recourse  redundancy  regress  relations  relationship  relationships  relief  religion  renedescartes  renormalization  rent-seeking  replaceable  representation  republicans  resources  retribalization  reuiniontower  rhetoric  ridesharing  risk  role  rolle  romance  rose  rules  safety  sandberg  sandbox  scale  scarcity  science  scifi  search  security  sensual  service  sexism  sexismus  sexual  shadow  shareholder  sheryl  silicon  sincerity  single  skepticism  skill  skills  sky  sleep  slippage  sne  social  socialjustice  socialmedia  socialnetworking  society  sociology  software  sound  sousveillance  space  spam  spectrum  speculation  speech  spin  stability  start-up  state  statecraft  status  stereotype  strange  strategy  stress  structure  study  subsendence  suffering  suffrage  sundaymorning  supply  surveillance  suspension  svihlikova  symmetry  symptom  taleb  taqiyya  target  taxis  tea  team  tech  technocracy  technology  telecommunications  tension  terror  terrorism  tetris  tetrominoes  themet  theory  thomascampbell  thought  threat  tiltw27  time  times  timing  tolerance  tops  toryparty  tragedyofthecommons  transformation  transgender  transparency  transport  trust  tuning_system  tweegram  twitter  twoway  uber  ubi  ubiquitous  ui  uk  unbearable  unconscious  underground  unfriction  unification  unified  unintended  unknown  unknowns  unreality  unschooling  usa  user  utilitarianism  ux  valley  value  venture  ventures  victim  violence  virtual  war  watchouttheworldsbehindyou  web  weird  western  white-collar  whitespace  with  withdrawal  within  witness  wolfskin  women  wonder  words  wordswithfriends  work  worker  workforce  workplace  worldhealthorganization  writing  ww1  ww2  york  zen 

Copy this bookmark: