ambivalence   93

« earlier    

Six rules for managing our era’s oversupply of non-stop news, high-decibel outrage
May 11, 2019 | The Globe and Mail | editorials.

Rule No. 1: You don’t need to have an opinion about everything. Shocking but true. ....It’s perfectly fair to say, “I don’t know enough to have an opinion on that," or, “I will leave that to others to debate,” or even, “Both sides have some good points.” You might not please everyone, but see Rule No. 2.

* Rule No. 2: You can’t please everyone. Get over it.

* Rule No. 3: Embrace ambivalence....often misinterpreted as indifference, or derided as indecision. In fact, the ability to entertain contradictory but animating ideas goes to the heart of what it means to be a mature and civilized human being. It’s also central to preserving political freedom. The most dangerous person in a democracy is the blind partisan who outsources her opinions to politicians or an ideology, and who sees those who don’t agree as enemies to be righteously chased from town by a torch-wielding mob. The biggest threat to such black-and-white partisanship is the person who keeps her mind open, is not blindly loyal to any one team and sees people with different opinions not as monsters to be slain but as human beings to be understood, especially when you disagree with them, and they disagree with you.

* Rule No. 4: When you take a stand, be forceful. While the process of reaching a conclusion should involve a lot of “on the one hand” and “on the other,” at some point you have to make a choice.

In a criminal trial, the decision to convict an accused person can only be taken if the evidence is persuasive beyond a reasonable doubt – in other words, if the evidence is irrefutable and the conclusion is certain. But in politics, business and life, most decisions must be taken under conditions that cannot meet that exacting standard. Reasonable doubts are reasonable. Only the extreme partisan is without them.

* Rule No. 5: Set your bottom line. How far are you willing to let another person go before you feel obliged to offer a counter-opinion? Not every take you hear deserves the energy required to argue against it. Sometimes, you have to just let people say things you don’t agree with. You might learn something.

And remember, just as there is no obligation to have an opinion on every subject, there is also no rule that says you must express your opinion every time the chance presents itself. But when someone or something does cross a line, sometimes you can’t hold back. It may be as lofty as a matter of justice, or a simple as a question of common sense, but there comes a moment when your opinion will matter.

* Rule No. 6: Opinions are not the same thing as empathy. Empathy is what makes it possible for people who disagree to live together in peace and harmony – to agreeably disagree. And in a multicultural, multireligious, multiracial, multiparty democracy, people are going to disagree about all sorts of things, all the time.

The world has enough opinions. What it really needs is more empathy. Without it, life isn’t possible.
21st._century  agreeably_disagree  ambivalence  commoditization_of_information  disagreements  disinformation  dual-consciousness  empathy  hard_choices  incivility  incompatibilities  information_overload  news  opinions  open_mind  outrage  partial_truths  partisanship  partisan_loyalty  political_spin  propaganda  rules_of_the_game 
9 weeks ago by jerryking
The Book of Life -- On Bittersweet Memories
'Surveying bits of our past – perhaps while in the bath, on a walk, or a flight – we may come across a particular type of memory colloquially known as ‘bittersweet’. -- We might remember afternoons we used to spend, when we were little, with our grandmother. Together we’d do a bit of weeding in her tiny garden, then we’d make lunch and play cards. Sometimes she showed us her old photographs of her own distant childhood. We enjoyed those times very much – but the memory of them is mixed up with the knowledge of what happened later. In adolescence, we pushed away from her, we almost never visited – and she died before we’d found our adult selves. She never got to know about the love we now feel for her. We wince at our recollections. -- ... In themselves, bittersweet memories can seem small and not very important. We perhaps don’t think about them very often; it can feel ticklishly uncomfortable to do so. But they’re quietly pointing us to something major about the human condition. Bittersweet memories force us to acknowledge that the positive in our lives is never far from being devilishly entwined with something more difficult. We feel, in the presence of bittersweet memories, the pain of being flawed, error-prone, time-short and regretful humans. -- It would, in a sense, be easier if things were more clear cut; white is simple enough to take and black, too, can be coped with when we know it has to be borne. It’s the grey – with its mercurial admixture of hope and regret – that is so hard for our minds. We long to call some people pure and dismiss others as monstrous, and we do the same with sections of our lives. But to be open to bittersweet memories is to accept ambivalence: a capacity to have two contrasting, opposed emotions about the same thing without disowning either. Both are important, neither can be denied. We’re recognising, rather than denying, the fiendishly mixed character of experience. -- We speak of bittersweet memories, but the territory they cover extends over far more than select bits of the past. We should, more rightly, also be ready to speak of, and reconcile ourselves gracefully to, bittersweet marriages, careers, holidays, weekends… Indeed, to the grandest and most necessary concept of all: that we are fated to have bittersweet lives.'
psychology  ambivalence  regret  awe  absurd 
april 2018 by adamcrowe
Adam Phillips · Against Self-Criticism · LRB 5 March 2015
Ambivalence does not, in the Freudian story, mean mixed feelings, it means opposing feelings.
adamphillips  ambivalence 
july 2017 by Walpole
YouTube -- Alain de Botton on Attachment Styles and the Art of Compromise
"What does it mean to love? To love means to have the willingness to interpret someone's, on the surface, not very appealing behaviour, in order to find more benevolent reasons why it may be unfolding. In other words, to love someone is to apply charity and generosity of interpretation."
philosophy  psychology  relationships  love  ambivalence 
july 2017 by adamcrowe

« earlier    

related tags

+  *  1980s  1985  1991  1993  2000s  2001  2007  2008  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2016  2017  2018  21st._century  4blog  absence  absurd  abuse  ac2k  acceleration  acceptance  action  adamphillips  adaptation  addiction  advice  aesthetics  affectregulation  agency  agi  agreeably_disagree  aimee_mann  aimless  alcohol  alcoholism  aliveness  alternative  altright  ambientimmediacy  ambientintimacy  ambiguity  ambition  ambivalent-friendships  americanfinearts  analysisparalysis  andreafraser  anger  anthlogy  anti  anxiety  apartheid  apple  applemac  arcadesproject  argentina  argumentation  art  artforum  articles  assessment  atmosphere  attachment  attention  authority  avoidance  awareness  awe  backdrop  background  basketball  beauty  behaviours  benjaminbratton  benjaminbuchloh  bernadettecorporation  bertoltbrecht  bible  biennale  bigdaddy  birthday  birthrate  blog  body  bored  boredom  brain  brecht  broadcast  bruises  brunolatour  cabinet  california  call-in-show  capitalism  carnival  chaos  charlesbaudelaire  childhood  childlike  china  choice  christianity  city  civilwar  clangelessness  class  clonemaker  cnet  cocaine  coconut  cognition  cognitivedissonance  cognitivestyle  coincidence  colindeland  colonialism  comics  commediadellarte  commoditization_of_information  communication  computers  concordance  confidence  conflict  conscious  consciousexotica  consciousness  constructionism  consumer  consumerism  contempt  context  continuouspartialattention  contradiction  control  conversation  cooperunion  corruption  creativity  crimestop  crisis  criticism  cuauhtemocmedina  culturalrevolution  culture  culturewar  cute  dam  dancing  danielkeller  deannahavas  death  debt  decision-making  decision  decisionmaking  decisions  defencemechanisms  defoo  democracy  denial  depression  desktoppc  dialectics  dictatorship  disagreements  discourse  disinformation  displacement  dissociation  dissonance  distance  distortion  distraction  documentation  donfenn  donnaharaway  doors  double  doubling  doubt  dream  drinking  drugs  drunk  dual-consciousness  duality  duckspeak  dunno  dziuban  early_career_and_education  economics  economy  education  eecummings  ego  eli  embodiment  emotion  emotions  empathy  enlightenment  environment  environmental  eula  event  evocativeobjects  experienceeconomy  fake-friendship  fake  fallacy  false-self  falseself  family  fantasy  fat  fatness  fault  faultiness  fear  feelings  feminism  fewdays  fiorina  fishing  flaneur  flood  fordism  francoisrabelais  freedom  friendship  future  fyodordostoevsky  garyzhexizhang  gaze  gender  generations  georgegrosz  ghost  globalism  gluttony  goodthink  governance  greek  green  grouprelations  growth  growthanxiety  habit  hallucination  hanshaacke  hard_choices  haunted  health  hero  heroes  heroin  hipster  history-education  history  hope  howwelearn  howweteach  hughfrost  humility  humor  hunting  hysteria  ice  idealization  identity  identitypolitics  ideology  idiosyncrasy  ignorance  ilovelucy  image  imminentdeath  impression  incivility  incompatibilities  indecision  indefinite  indicator  individuation  industrial  inequality  infiniteplayer  information_overload  infrastructure  innovation  insideout  institutions  insufficient  intellectualpropertyrights  intelligence  interesting  interference  internalization  internet  interpretation  inversion  iphone  irony  irrationality  jamesbridle  japan  japanization  jeanpiaget  jonrafman  joy  judgement  justification  karenbarad  kellereastrling  kickstarter  kids  knot  land  landscape  language  larp  latin-america  laurenberlant  law  lazy  leak  lehavre  leighannnaidoo  leisure  leveling  liberalism  licenseagreement  life  lifehacker  light  liminality  liminalobjects  literature  living  loaded  loitering  lostdecades  love  lucilleball  ludens  macclone  macclones  maccompatibles  macdesktop  macosx  macpc  macservers  mad  magic  management  marywallingblackburn  mask  masks  massculture  matteroftime  maze  meaningless  mecosystem  memory  mexico  mihailbakhtin  mikepepi  mind  mindbody  minor  mobile  modernity  mold  mom  mommyblog  money  morality  morbid  morgan_murphy  motherhood  mothers  motivation  mouldmap  mourning  music  mycelium  mythology  narcissism  negation  neiltennant  neoliberal  neon  networks  newmedia  news  newyork  nobs  nonaspiration  nonhuman  nonlinear  nonsense  novelty  obesity  object  objects  observation  occupation  online  open_mind  opencomputer  operatingsystem  opinion  opinions  originality  osx  ottodix  out  outrage  overidentification  overthinking  ownlife  painting  parafiction  parenting  parents  paris  partial_truths  partisan_loyalty  partisanship  parts  patriarchy  pdf  peace-process  peace  pedestrian  people  performance  personality  petshopboys  phatic  philipguston  philosophy  photography  piaget  pierrebourdieu  platform  play  plotlessness  poetry  police  political_spin  politics  polyphony  porn  possibilities  possibilityspace  postmaterialism  postmodern  postwar  power  precarity  preposition  present  private  probabilityspace  problemreactionsolution  process  procrastination  projectiveidentification  propaganda  proregression  protest  psychiatry  psychobiology  psychology  psychopolitics  psychotherapy  publishing  puppetry  pv  quiet  quotations  quotes  race  rage  reactionformation  realness  reconciliation  reference  reflexivity  regret  relationalobjects  relationships  religion  reneziegler  repression  research  researchanddevelopment  resolution  responsibility  retail  retropia  review  revolution  richardbrautigan  risk  rkselectiontheory  rules_of_the_game  russ  ryantrecartin  sanfranciscodiggers  script  security  seeking  self-improvement  self-knowledge  self-sabotage  self  selfdeception  selfempathy  selfesteem  selfevident  selfobjects  sense  sensor  sentimental  sentimentality  servers  sex  sexuality  seymourpapert  shame  shanghaibiennale  sherryturkle  sherrytutkle  shrink  siannengai  siblings  slime  slimemold  soapopera  socialism  socialnetworking  society  sociology  solitude  sousveillance  southaftrica  space  splitting  spooky  standalonecomplex  statism  status  stefanmolyneux  stigma  story  storytelling  strange  streetlamp  streetlight  style  subject  subjectivity  sublime  success  suppression  surveillance  suspension  swarm  syntonicity  systems  talking  teaching  technology  telephone  tension  tethered  texts  theory  therapy  thero  thinking  thirdposition  thirtysomething  thomasnagel  thomaspynchon  time  timeapple  timecoded  timetravel  tom-bilyeu  toyfriends  toyrus  toys  tradition  tragedy  transactionalanalysis  transformation  transgression  transmediale  transposition  trap  trauma  trickster  trolling  trout  true-self  trueself  truth  truthbeauty  ubiquity  unanswer  unask  undeniable  unemployment  unitedstates  unquestion  upb  update  urban  urgent!  value  vanessa-van-edwards  vanishingmediator  victims  video  videogames  violence  virtue  voice  walking  walkingsimulator  walterbenjamin  war  water  weapon  wendychun  whitneybiennial  wikipedia  williamgibson  wind  wls  work  workplace  writing  wsj  you  youth  youtube  yunfeiji  zanni  zany  zen  zombies 

Copy this bookmark: