alignment   1431

« earlier    

A Comprehensive Guide to Flexbox Alignment
Alignment is probably the most confusing aspect of flexbox. The flexbox layout module has a handful of alignment properties that behave differently under different circumstances, and when using them you might not necessarily understand what is happening or why. However, if you know what to pay attention to, alignment is less complicated than it first appears. This tutorial will help you understand flexbox alignment perfectly.
css  cssbasics  flexbox  grids  layout  alignment 
5 days ago by spaceninja
03:40, Half inch plywood for the base.
03:45, Thicker plywood for the fences.
04:20, runners
05:40, howto attach runners to plywood
05:55, how to lay or place the plywood with expect to the runners.
06:00, nice T-Square
06:10, how to draw reference lines using the T-square, which would help with putting the holes in the proper place
06:15, how to set up the countersink bit
07:00, how to check the flatness of the fences
07:50, how to cut the Kerf
08:00, howto line up the fences at exactly 90 degrees to the Blade and Kerf.
make  a  crosscut  sled  for  table  saw  needsEditing  questionable  wood  whisperer  howto  proper  alignment  90  ninety  degrees  on  timeLine 
28 days ago by neerajsinghvns
LensAlign and FocusTune Review - Bob Atkins Photography
The LensAlign system is well designed and does what it claims to do. It enables the user to tune focus microadjustment for best results and find the sharpest aperture of a lens quickly and easily, especially when the FocusTune software is used.

The focusing target system "LensAlign" (i.e. the hardware) will cost you around $85. The complete system, which includes the "LensAlign" hardware and the "FocusTune" software will cost you around $125.
photography  tool  advice  reference  focus  alignment 
5 weeks ago by bwiese
Contingent, Not Arbitrary | Truth is contingent on what is, not on what we wish to be true.
A vital attribute of a value system of any kind is that it works. I consider this a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for goodness. A value system, when followed, should contribute to human flourishing and not produce results that violate its core ideals. This is a pragmatic, I-know-it-when-I-see-it definition. I may refine it further if the need arises.

I think that the prevailing Western values fail by this standard. I will not spend much time arguing this; many others have already. If you reject this premise, this blog may not be for you.

I consider old traditions an important source of wisdom: they have proven their worth over centuries of use. Where they agree, we should listen. Where they disagree, we should figure out why. Where modernity departs from tradition, we should be wary of the new.

Tradition has one nagging problem: it was abandoned by the West. How and why did that happen? I consider this a central question. I expect the reasons to be varied and complex. Understanding them seems necessary if we are to fix what may have been broken.

In short, I want to answer these questions:

1. How do values spread and persist? An ideology does no good if no one holds it.
2. Which values do good? Sounding good is worse than useless if it leads to ruin.

The ultimate hope would be to find a way to combine the two. Many have tried and failed. I don’t expect to succeed either, but I hope I’ll manage to clarify the questions.

Christianity Is The Schelling Point:
Restoring true Christianity is both necessary and sufficient for restoring civilization. The task is neither easy nor simple but that’s what it takes. It is also our best chance of weathering the collapse if that’s too late to avoid.

Christianity is the ultimate coordination mechanism: it unites us with a higher purpose, aligns us with the laws of reality and works on all scales, from individuals to entire civilizations. Christendom took over the world and then lost it when its faith faltered. Historically and culturally, Christianity is the unique Schelling point for the West – or it would be if we could agree on which church (if any) was the true one.

Here are my arguments for true Christianity as the Schelling point. I hope to demonstrate these points in subsequent posts; for now I’ll just list them.

- A society of saints is the most powerful human arrangement possible. It is united in purpose, ideologically stable and operates in harmony with natural law. This is true independent of scale and organization: from military hierarchy to total decentralization, from persecuted minority to total hegemony. Even democracy works among saints – that’s why it took so long to fail.
- There is such a thing as true Christianity. I don’t know how to pinpoint it but it does exist; that holds from both secular and religious perspectives. Our task is to converge on it the best we can.
- Don’t worry too much about the existence of God. I’m proof that you don’t need that assumption in order to believe – it helps but isn’t mandatory.

Pascal’s Wager never sat right with me. Now I know why: it’s a sucker bet. Let’s update it.

If God exists, we must believe because our souls and civilization depend on it. If He doesn’t exist, we must believe because civilization depends on it.

Morality Should Be Adaptive:
I agree with this
gnon  todo  blog  stream  religion  christianity  theos  morality  ethics  formal-values  philosophy  truth  is-ought  coordination  cooperate-defect  alignment  tribalism  cohesion  nascent-state  counter-revolution  epistemic  civilization  rot  fertility  intervention  europe  the-great-west-whale  occident  telos-atelos  multi  ratty  hanson  big-picture  society  culture  evolution  competition  🤖  rationality  rhetoric  contrarianism  values  water  embedded-cognition  ideology  deep-materialism  moloch  new-religion  patho-altruism  darwinian  existence  good-evil  memetics  direct-indirect  endogenous-exogenous  tradition  anthropology  cultural-dynamics  farmers-and-foragers  egalitarianism-hierarchy  organizing  institutions  protestant-catholic  enlightenment-renaissance-restoration-reformation  realness  science  empirical  modernity  revolution  inference  parallax  axioms  pragmatic  zeitgeist  schelling  prioritizing  ends-means  degrees-of-freedom  logic  reason  interdisciplinary 
9 weeks ago by nhaliday
[1804.04268] Incomplete Contracting and AI Alignment
We suggest that the analysis of incomplete contracting developed by law and economics researchers can provide a useful framework for understanding the AI alignment problem and help to generate a systematic approach to finding solutions. We first provide an overview of the incomplete contracting literature and explore parallels between this work and the problem of AI alignment. As we emphasize, misalignment between principal and agent is a core focus of economic analysis. We highlight some technical results from the economics literature on incomplete contracts that may provide insights for AI alignment researchers. Our core contribution, however, is to bring to bear an insight that economists have been urged to absorb from legal scholars and other behavioral scientists: the fact that human contracting is supported by substantial amounts of external structure, such as generally available institutions (culture, law) that can supply implied terms to fill the gaps in incomplete contracts. We propose a research agenda for AI alignment work that focuses on the problem of how to build AI that can replicate the human cognitive processes that connect individual incomplete contracts with this supporting external structure.
nibble  preprint  org:mat  papers  ai  ai-control  alignment  coordination  contracts  law  economics  interests  culture  institutions  number  context  behavioral-econ  composition-decomposition  rent-seeking  whole-partial-many 
9 weeks ago by nhaliday
Surveil things, not people – The sideways view
Technology may reach a point where free use of one person’s share of humanity’s resources is enough to easily destroy the world. I think society needs to make significant changes to cope with that scenario.

Mass surveillance is a natural response, and sometimes people think of it as the only response. I find mass surveillance pretty unappealing, but I think we can capture almost all of the value by surveilling things rather than surveilling people. This approach avoids some of the worst problems of mass surveillance; while it still has unattractive features it’s my favorite option so far.


The idea
We’ll choose a set of artifacts to surveil and restrict. I’ll call these heavy technology and everything else light technology. Our goal is to restrict as few things as possible, but we want to make sure that someone can’t cause unacceptable destruction with only light technology. By default something is light technology if it can be easily acquired by an individual or small group in 2017, and heavy technology otherwise (though we may need to make some exceptions, e.g. certain biological materials or equipment).

Heavy technology is subject to two rules:

1. You can’t use heavy technology in a way that is unacceptably destructive.
2. You can’t use heavy technology to undermine the machinery that enforces these two rules.

To enforce these rules, all heavy technology is under surveillance, and is situated such that it cannot be unilaterally used by any individual or small group. That is, individuals can own heavy technology, but they cannot have unmonitored physical access to that technology.


This proposal does give states a de facto monopoly on heavy technology, and would eventually make armed resistance totally impossible. But it’s already the case that states have a massive advantage in armed conflict, and it seems almost inevitable that progress in AI will make this advantage larger (and enable states to do much more with it). Realistically I’m not convinced this proposal makes things much worse than the default.

This proposal definitely expands regulators’ nominal authority and seems prone to abuses. But amongst candidates for handling a future with cheap and destructive dual-use technology, I feel this is the best of many bad options with respect to the potential for abuse.
ratty  acmtariat  clever-rats  risk  existence  futurism  technology  policy  alt-inst  proposal  government  intel  authoritarianism  orwellian  tricks  leviathan  security  civilization  ai  ai-control  arms  defense  cybernetics  institutions  law  unintended-consequences  civil-liberty  volo-avolo  power  constraint-satisfaction  alignment 
9 weeks ago by nhaliday
Easy and Accurate Reconstruction of Whole HIV Genomes from Short-Read Sequence Data
Similar to what we’ve been doing for HHV8, but for HIV: _de novo_ assemble reads, construct a sample-specific reference, and then use that to map the same reads to avoid as much reference-bias as possible. There’s a nice enhancement around the reference construction which considers the similarity of the various reference sequences, which is more useful for HIV with it’s many subtypes than HHV8.
hiv  sequencing  ngs  bioinformatics  work  alignment  mapping  assembly  paper 
12 weeks ago by trs

« earlier    

related tags

-  1940's  3d  80000-hours  90  a  access  acm  acmtariat  advice  aggregator  agile  agility  ai-control  ai  algorithms  align  alt-inst  altruism  analysis  annotation  anthropic  anthropology  antidemos  arms  arrangement  article  articulos  assembly  authoritarianism  automated  automation  autonomy  axioms  axis  banksarron  behavioral-econ  benevolence  biases  big-peeps  big-picture  bioinformatics  block  blog  borders  bostrom  brexit  business  c++  carbon  career  careers  causation  cg  change  charts  cheat-sheets  cheatsheet  chemistry  christianity  civil-liberty  civilization  clever-rats  cnt  coaching  code  codepen  cohesion  commitments  communication  competition  complement-substitute  composite  composition-decomposition  computer-vision  computergraphics  computervision  conquest-empire  constraint-satisfaction  content-samurai  context  contracts  contrarianism  cool  cooperate-defect  coordination  corbynjeremy  core-rats  corporate  counter-revolution  coupler  cr-10  cr-10s  cr10  crosscut  css-grid  css  css_flexbox  cssbasics  cssgrid  cultural-dynamics  culture  curve  customsunion  cv  cybernetics  darwinian  data  davisdavid  dc:creator=d'anconamatthew  dc:creator=kuenssberglaura  dctagged  deep-learning  deep-materialism  deepgoog  defense  degrees-of-freedom  degrees  design  deterrence  direct-indirect  distribution  dnd  dungeons-and-dragons  dup  ecj  economics  effective-altruism  effects  egalitarianism-hierarchy  embedded-cognition  empirical  endogenous-exogenous  ends-means  enlightenment-renaissance-restoration-reformation  epistemic  escalation  ethics  eu  europe  evolution  existence  expansionism  explanation  exposition  fabbing  fairness  faragenigel  farmers-and-foragers  favorites  fdm  fermi  fertility  fiber  film  finance  flex  flexbox  floats  focus  food  for-toni  for  foreign-policy  formal-values  formatting  fournier  freedomofmovement  freetrade  fridayfrontend  frontier  fta  futurism  game-theory  games  gedanken  gnon  goals  good-evil  government  graphic_design  graphicdesign  grid  grids  growth-econ  guide  hacker  hallux  hanson  hardware  head  headstand  history  hiv  hoshin  howto  human-ml  icon  identifiers  ideology  ifttt  image  images  immigration  inference  info-foraging  injury  institutions  intel  intelligence  interdisciplinary  interests  intervention  ireland  iron-age  is-ought  iteration-recursion  jeep  justify  kanri  kindness  labor  labourparty  lancasterhouse  law  layout  lead  leadership  leadscrew  learning  leave  legal  lesswrong  leviathan  liabilities  limitus  list  logic  long-read  machine-learning  machinelearning  machining  make  management  manufacturing  mapping  marginalia  margins  materials  matlab  maytheresa  mcdonnelljohn  mediterranean  membership  memes  memetics  methodology  minilathe  minimill  miri-cfar  modernity  moloch  morality  multi  multiple  nanotube  nascent-state  needsediting  negative_space  negotiations  neurons  new-religion  news  ngs  nibble  ninety  northernireland  nozzle  number  obligations  occident  on  optical  org:bleg  org:data  org:lite  org:mat  organizing  orwellian  overshoot  padding  paper  papers  parallax  participation  patho-altruism  peace-violence  people  performance  philosophy  photography  physics  planning  plugin  pocket  policy  polisci  politics  power  powershell  pragmatic  preprint  print  printing  prioritizing  priors-posteriors  pro-rata  probability  productivity  programming  proper  proposal  protestant-catholic  prudence  purpose  python  questionable  questions  radio  rationality  ratty  realness  reason  reference  reflection  registration  regression-to-mean  reinforcement  relativity  religion  rent-seeking  repair  research-program  research  revolution  rhetoric  risk  rod  rollie  rot  rotating  rotational  rpgs  sandwiches  saw  schelling  science  screw  security  sentences  separator  sequence  sequencing  settlement  simulation  singlemarket  singularity  sketch  skill  sled  social-science  society  software  sorting  space  spacing  speculation  speech  speed  spindle  starmerkeir  statesmen  stewart  strategy  stream  street-fighting  strings  subculture  summary  table  tailstock  teams  technology  telos-atelos  the-classics  the-great-west-whale  theos  thinking  threat-modeling  timeline  todo  toe  tool  top-n  tracer  trade  tradeoffs  tradition  tramming  transition  treatment  tribalism  tricks  trivia  troubleshooting  trust  truth  tube  tuskdonald  tutorial  tutorials  typography  ui  uk  unintended-consequences  ux  value  values  verhofstadtguy  vision  visual  volo-avolo  warner  water  webdev  weight  whisperer  whole-partial-many  wood  work  x-matrix  xenobio  yoga  youtube  z-axis  z  zaxis  zeitgeist  🤖 

Copy this bookmark: