ailes   47

Taibbi: Roger Ailes Was One of the Worst Americans Ever - Rolling Stone
Fox News founder made this the hate-filled, moronic country it is today
Ailes  Fox  Taibbi 
may 2017 by KMP
Twitter
Fox News should do a documentary called "To Enable a Predator" starring , & trump.
LastWord  Ailes  oreilly  from twitter_favs
april 2017 by kohlmannj
Paul Manafort Quits Donald Trump’s Campaign After a Tumultuous Run - NYTimes.com
On Sunday, Mr. Trump hastily convened a meeting of paid and unpaid advisers including the pollster Kellyanne Conway; Roger Ailes, the ousted Fox News chairman; and Stephen K. Bannon, the chairman of Breitbart News, a conservative website > what a bunch!
trump  foxnews  ailes 
august 2016 by yorksranter
Ailes Used Fox Budget to Finance Campaigns Against Enemies
But with Ailes gone, Fox executives are now looking closely at how Ailes spent Fox money. And what they are discovering is that, beyond the sexual harassment claims, Ailes was also able to use portions of the Fox budget to hire consultants, political operatives, and private detectives that reported only to him
Murdoch  ailes  FoxNews  leveson 
august 2016 by yorksranter
Inside Ailes' War Room: Megyn Was the Last Straw
Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly's stunning silence amid Roger Ailes' sexual harassment scandal was the point at which the embattled CEO knew his storied career at the network he founded was over, ABC News reports.
Pocket  fox  news  media  newsmax  politics  roger  ailes  sexual  harassment 
july 2016 by silver25u
Donald Trump vs. Fox News: The Big Picture - The New Yorker
Donald Trump has announced that he will skip the last Republican debate, which is being aired on Fox News with Megyn Kelly as a moderator.
Donald Trump has announced that he will skip the last Republican debate, which is being aired on Fox News with Megyn Kelly as a moderator.
CREDIT PHOTOGRAPH BY SEAN RAYFORD / GETTY
If you’re like me, you can’t get enough of the story about Donald Trump skipping the Fox News debate in Iowa on Thursday night. We have: Trump trying to bully Roger Ailes, the chairman of Fox News, into dumping Trump’s supposed tormentor Megyn Kelly, who is scheduled to be one of the three debate moderators on Thursday, reportedly because he feared that he wouldn’t receive fair treatment; Fox responding with a press release, reportedly put together by Ailes and a crony, which began, “We learned from a secret back channel that the Ayatollah and Putin both intend to treat Donald Trump unfairly when they meet with him if he becomes president”; Trump pulling out of the debate; and virtually every journalist in America, and some from overseas, speculating about what it all means.

Did Trump make a big mistake, as Tuesday’s conventional wisdom held? Was it a Machiavellian stroke of genius that will spare him the possibility of slipping up on the eve of the Iowa vote, while costing Fox millions of viewers and millions of dollars in advertising revenue? Or was it, as my colleague Amy Davidson wryly suggested, a well-timed exit from a series of G.O.P. debates that are simply “no longer what Trump might call a classy venue”? As for Ailes, has he lost it? If not, why did he approve such a juvenile press release? Why did Kelly invite Michael Moore, the liberal documentary filmmaker, who detests everything that Fox News stands for, onto her show on Tuesday night, where he revelled in Fox’s woes? And what does Rupert Murdoch, the ultimate power at Fox, think of it all?

I admit it: I’ve spent much of the past twenty-four hours pondering these imponderables. But there are also larger issues at stake, one of which is freedom of the press. Trump’s efforts to bully Fox into excluding a journalist he doesn’t like—or, rather, appears to loathe with a venom that is glaringly incommensurate with anything that Kelly has said or done—are quite reprehensible. And, sadly, it’s nothing new. Whenever a journalist or media outlet criticizes Trump, he slimes them, verbally or on Twitter, and tries to disempower them. Sometimes he succeeds.

Last week, the Republican National Committee disinvited the National Review, which had published a special issue of articles criticizing Trump, from co-hosting a Republican debate scheduled for February 25th. Something similar happened a couple of weeks previously, when ABC News dropped the Union Leader, a conservative New Hampshire newspaper that has attacked Trump, as a partner in a debate on February 6th. “I am pleased to announce that I had the Union Leader removed,” Trump tweeted after ABC made its announcement.

Evidently, these craven moves by the R.N.C. and ABC News encouraged Trump to try his luck again. To its credit, as of Wednesday evening, Fox News was still refusing to buckle to his demands. In a statement issued to the Washington Post, Ailes said, “Megyn Kelly is an excellent journalist, and the entire network stands behind her. She will absolutely be on the debate stage on Thursday night.” Meanwhile, the Fox News Web site was featuring a promo for the debate in which Martha MacCallum, another Fox anchor, says, “Our job is to get America’s questions answered,” and Kelly adds, “And we are going to do our job.”

Of course, it’s a bit rich for Fox News to promote itself as a source of independent, hard-hitting journalism. Ever since it was founded, in 1996, the network has been avowedly conservative, friendly toward the Republican Party, and, with a few individual exceptions, hostile to Democrats. Indeed, that’s why Murdoch founded Fox News in the first place: to fill what he viewed as a big gap in the television-news market. But, in this instance, Fox’s ideological slant is not the issue. The network is in the right, and Trump is in the wrong. Case closed.

Press freedom isn’t the only issue here. It’s also a battle over who controls the Republican Party. Trump is doing what he has already done in many other areas: challenging established customs and establishment institutions—of which, in the Republican world, there aren’t many bigger and more powerful than Fox News. On his talk-radio show on Tuesday, Rush Limbaugh, who is a Trump supporter, was quite explicit about this. “There isn’t any fear here,” Limbaugh said of Trump’s approach. “What there is is a desire to control this—and not put himself in a circumstance where other people want to make him look bad. It isn’t really any more complicated than that.” Shortly after Limbaugh’s show was broadcast, Trump tweeted, “Just got to listen to Rush Limbaugh—the guy is fantastic!”

Fox News insists that it had no intention of making Trump look bad, but that isn’t the point here. In saying that he would skip the debate, Trump was effectively sending a message that he’s bigger than the event. Since Fox News became popular, virtually no one in Republican circles has been willing to challenge the network like this. In the normal run of things, Republican campaigns compete fiercely for the attention of Fox shows, and Republican politicians and operatives compete fiercely for cushy jobs as network pundits. When Fox drops a Republican, as it dropped Sarah Palin last year, it is widely seen as a crushing blow.

Trump needs to reach Fox News’s conservative viewers, too, of course. That’s why he has appeared on the network and its sibling Fox Business more than a hundred and thirty times. But he is now seeking to dictate the terms of his relationship with Fox, and demonstrating that if it doesn’t accede to his demands he won’t back down. Which is, of course, precisely the approach he has adopted with other G.O.P. candidates, such as Rick Perry and Ted Cruz, and other G.O.P.-related institutions, such as the conservative print media. It’s how he does business, and it’s shaking up the Republican Party and its environs in a remarkable way.

The members of the Washington-based Republican establishment, of which Fox News is an offshoot, aren’t pleased to be in Trump’s path, of course. Conceivably, however, the levelling effects of the tornado could end up benefitting the Party, which, in recent years, has concentrated almost entirely on placating its elderly conservative base (the average age of a Fox News viewer is sixty-eight) and its rich financial donors.
Trump  Fox  Murdoch  Ailes  debate  Megyn  Kelly 
february 2016 by mattshuham
Zucker: GOP being run from Fox News headquarters – USA TODAY
USA TODAYPASADENA, Calif. (AP) — The chiefs of CNN and Fox News Channel are throwing shots at each other, each suggesting the other’s network is essentially out of the news business. Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes struck first, saying in an interview published …CNN’s Jeff Zucker Denies Jay Leno Recruit RumorAceShowbizCNN chief Zucker slams Fox […]
IFTTT  Zennie62  Entertainment  Angeles  Times  Mediaiteall  CNN  Fox  News  Chairman  Roger  Ailes  Channel  GOP  Jeff  Zucker  Denies  Jay  Leno  Recruit  Jose  Mercury 
january 2014 by zennie62

related tags

(img)  090316  0916  activism  angeles  archive  bigg  bill-clinton-predator  boonsville  breitbart  bubble  cable  car  chairman  chamber  channel  cnn  conservatism  conservatives  crime  criminal  dailyintell  debate  denies  design  douthat-agree  echo  entertainment  facts  fly  flying_car  fnc  focus  fox  fox_news  foxnews  gender  glenbeck  glenn_beck  gop  harassment  history  hugo  ifttt  jay  jeff  jose  journalism  kelly  lastword  leno  leveson  lies  limbaugh  media  media_bias  mediaiteall  megyn  mercury  misinformation  misinformed  murdoch  news  news_corporation  newscorp  newsmax  nixon  oreilly  o’reilly  palin  pocket  politics  politifact  power-corruption  propaganda  rea=browning_tod  recruit  republican  republicans  rmc  roger  sexism  sexual-assault  sexual  taibbi  technology  theme  times  tobin  trump-hypocracy  trump-predator  trump  truth  tv  us  vampire  voiture  web  weinstein  zennie62  zionism  zucker 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: