academics   3724

« earlier    

RT : This happens often to - yesterday a neighbor said - Lucky that you are free for the summer and don't hav…
academics  from twitter
yesterday by emelaktas
Alt-Ac Careers Articles from Inside Higher Ed
As per title: a collection of articles published on IHE dealing with 'Alt-Ac' subjects.
academics  career 
19 days ago by folquet
Academic Jobs Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia
This is a wiki for tracking searches in various categories for academic (i.e. faculty) positions. Hundreds of resources, guides, as well as listings for openings on a year-by-year basis (mostly UK and USA)
career  academics 
19 days ago by folquet
Humanities Journals Wiki
Documenting the experiences of working with academic journals in the humanities. Which journals move quickly on submission? Which journals give useful feedback? Which journals help your research reach an audience? Which journals are quality outlets, and which are predatory fakes?
academics  research 
19 days ago by folquet
Spadework | Issue 34 | n+1
"By the time I started organizing so much that it felt like a full-time job, it was the spring of 2016, and I had plenty of company. Around the country there were high-profile efforts to organize magazines, fast-food places, and nursing homes. Erstwhile Occupiers became involved in the Bernie Sanders campaign and joined the exploding Democratic Socialists of America, whose members receive shabby business cards proclaiming them an “official socialist organizer.” Today’s organizers — not activists, thank you — make clear that they are not black bloc participants brawling with police or hippies plotting a love-in. They are inspired by a tradition of professional revolutionaries, by Lenin’s exhortation that “unless the masses are organized, the proletariat is nothing. Organized — it is everything.” Organizing, in other words, is unembarrassed about power. It recognizes that to wield it you need to persuade untold numbers of people to join a cause, and to begin organizing themselves. Organizing means being in it to win.

But how do you win? Historical materialism holds that crises of capitalism spark revolts, perhaps even revolutions, as witnessed in the eruption of Occupy and Black Lives Matter; uprisings in Spain, Greece, and Egypt; and the British student movement against tuition fees. But there’s no guide for what happens in the long aftermath, as the left has often learned the hard way.

In previous moments of upheaval and promise the left has often turned to Antonio Gramsci, who sought to understand why working-class revolts in Europe following the Russian Revolution had led to fascism. Gramsci concluded that on some level people consent to subservience, even take it for granted, when the order in which they live comes to seem like common sense. Hegemony was subtler than outright coercion, more pervasive, permeating the tempos of daily life.

It was hegemony, Stuart Hall argued in 1983, that was key to understanding the disappointment of his own generation — why Thatcher and the new right had triumphed in remaking common sense after a decade of labor union revolt. Hegemony shaped how people acted when they weren’t thinking about it, what they thought was right and wrong, what they imagined the good life to be. A hegemonic project had to “occupy each and every front” of life, “to insert itself into the pores of the practical consciousness of human beings.” Thatcherism had understood this better than the left. It had “entered the struggle on every single front on which it calculated it could advance itself,” put forth a “theory for every single arena of human life,” from economics to language, morality to culture. The domains the left dismissed as bourgeois were simply the ones where the ruling class was winning. Yet creating hegemony was “difficult work,” Hall reminded us. Never fully settled, “it always has to be won.”"

"The Thatcherite project was since then much advanced, and we had internalized its dictates. For our whole lives we had learned to do school very well; in graduate school we learned to exploit ourselves on weekends and vacations before putting ourselves “on the market.” Many of us still believed in meritocracy, despite learning every day how it was failing us. The worse the conditions of academic life became, the harder everyone worked, and the harder it became to contest them. Plus, we were so lucky to be there — at Yale! Compared to so many grad students, we had it good, and surely jobs were waiting on the other side for us, if for anyone. Who were we to complain? Organizing a union of graduate students at Yale seemed to many like an act of unbearable privilege — a bunch of Ivy League self-styled radicals doing worker cosplay."

"Realizing that it was not enough for people to like me was revelatory. I had to learn to be more comfortable with antagonism and disagreement, with putting a choice in front of people and letting them make it instead of smiling away tension and doing the work myself. I had to expect more from other people. With other organizers, I role-played the conversations I feared most before having them; afterward, I replayed them over and over in my head. I struggled to be different: the version of myself I wanted to be, someone who could move people and bend at least some tiny corner of the universe.

It’s not easy to be the site of a battle for hegemony. It’s not a beatific Whitmanesque “I contain multitudes”; it’s an often painful struggle among your competing selves for dominance. You have one body and twenty-four hours in a day. An organizer asks what you’ll do with them, concretely, now. You may not like your own answer. Your inner Thatcherite will raise its voice. You can’t kill it off entirely; you will almost certainly find that it’s a bigger part of you than you thought. But organizing burrows into the pores of your practical consciousness and asks you to choose the part of yourself that wants something other than common sense. It’s unsettling. It can be alienating. And yet I also often felt I was finally reconciling parts of myself I’d tried to keep separate — what I thought, what I said, what I did. To organize, and to be organized, you have to keep in mind Hall’s lesson: there is no true or false consciousness, no true self that organizing discovers or undoes. You too, Hall reminds us, were made by this world you hope to change. The more distant the world you want to live in is from the world that exists, the more deeply you yourself will feel this disjuncture. “I’m not cut out for this,” people often say when they struggle with organizing. No one is: one isn’t born an organizer, but becomes one."

"The relationality of organizing is maybe the hardest thing to understand before you’ve done it. But it is the most important. This is not because people are governed by emotions instead of reason, though they sometimes are. It’s because the entire problem of collective action is that it’s rational to act collectively where it’s not to act alone. And you build the collective piece by piece.

Organizing relationships can be utopian: at their best, they offer the feminist dream of intimacy outside of romance or family. In the union, I loved people I did not know very well. In meetings I was often overcome with awe and affection at the courage and wisdom of the people there with me. I came to count many of the people I organized with as my dearest friends. When I needed help, there were always people I could call, people who would always pick up the phone, people I could and did talk to about anything. These relationships often served as a source of care and support in a world with too little of those things. But they were not only friendships, and not only emotional ballast. The people I looked to for support would also push me when it was called for, as I would them; that, I knew, was the deal.

Our relationships forged the practical commitments to one another that held the union together. They made us accountable to each other. They were difficult and multifaceted, often frustrating, intensely vulnerable, and potentially transformative but no less prone than any other relationship to carelessness, hurt, and betrayal, and always a lot of work. We were constantly building them and testing their limits, pushing each other harder the closer we got. They had to bear a lot of weight. In more abject moments, I wondered whether they were anything more than instrumental. More often, though, I wondered what was so menacing about usefulness that it threatened to contaminate all else.

The word comrade, Jodi Dean argues, names a political relationship, not a personal one: you are someone’s comrade not because you like them but because you are on the same side of a struggle. Comrades are not neighbors, citizens, or friends; nor are they any kind of family, though you might call them brother or sister. The comrade has no race, gender, or nation. (As one meme goes: “My favorite gender-neutral pronoun is comrade.”) Comrades are not even unique individuals; they are “multiple, replaceable, fungible.” You can be comrades with millions of people you have never met and never will. Your relationship is ultimately with the political project you have in common. To many noncommunists, Dean readily admits, this instrumentalism is “horrifying”: a confirmation that communism means submitting to the Borg. But the sameness of the comrade is a kind of genuine equality.

Being an organizer is like being a comrade in some ways but different in others. The people you organize alongside may be comrades, but the people you are organizing often aren’t; the point of organizing, after all, is to reach beyond the people who are already on your side and win over as many others as you can. So you can’t assume the people you organize share your values; in fact, you should usually assume they don’t. This means that unlike comrades, organizers aren’t interchangeable. It matters who you are. McAlevey’s theory of the organic leader is that people have to be organized by people they know and trust, not by strangers who claim to have the right ideas. The SNCC looked for “strong people” — not necessarily traditional leaders, but people who were respected and trusted among their peers, on the logic that people would only take risky political action alongside people they trusted. When organizers reflect the people they organize, they win: when women of color organize other women of color, a 2007 paper by Kate Bronfenbrenner and Dorian Warren shows, they win almost 90 percent of elections. This cuts both ways: when women and people of color led the organizing in my department, we often struggled to get white men to take us seriously.

Yet the comradely element of organizing can also open up space for building relationships with people beyond those boundaries. It’s not that class and race and gender disappear, transcended by the cause — … [more]
alyssabattistoni  organizing  academia  academics  highereducation  highered  2019  labor  work  unions  thatcherism  reaganism  margartthatcher  communism  ronaldreagan  capitalism  meritocracy  hegemony  stuarthall  busyness  antoniogramsci  comrades  relationships  relationality  utopia  hierarchy  instrumentalism  equality  leadership  politics  class  race  gender  school  schooliness  schooling  transcontextualism 
20 days ago by robertogreco
Opinion | How High School Ruined Leisure - The New York Times
Do you still do your thing — whatever your thing is — when no one is watching? Both the magic of that question and its existential angst lie in the freedom it presents. Maybe you do. Maybe you don’t.

It really only matters — really only has to matter — to you.

Ironically, in placing so much value on activities that our children came to out of love or interest, we grown-ups replaced the intrinsic motivations we often claim to value with extrinsic ones. When you’ve been taught that every action has a purpose, it’s harder to find meaning in just doing something you enjoy, and much more difficult to persuade yourself to do it.
college  academics  arts  kids  parenting  school  admissions 
26 days ago by emmacarlson
Filosofisk supplement
Filosofisk supplement is a student-run journal associated with the programme for Philosophy and History of Ideas at the University of Oslo (UiO). The journal is issued four times a year with a print run of 500. Our aims are to serve as a medium for dissemination of philosophy and to contribute to philosophical discussion both at the university and beyond.
philosophy  submittable  journal  academics 
5 weeks ago by folquet
Myles Allen – The Conversation
Myles Allen is Professor of Geosystem Science in the Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment and Department of Physics, University of Oxford. His research focuses on ho...
MylesAllen  academics  climatechange  from notes
7 weeks ago by heinzwittenbrink
Jennifer L Morgan
Jennifer L. Morgan is Professor of History in the department of Social and Cultural Analysis at New York University where she also serves as Chair
profile  academics  culturalstudies 
9 weeks ago by folquet
Semiotics Resources | Semiotic Society of America
The most up-to-date, comprehensive collection of semiotics resources on the web
sitografia  semiotics  academics 
9 weeks ago by folquet
Semiotics Institute Online
The Semiotics Institute Online offers advanced courses in a variety of topics relevant to semiotics. Browse the list of courses to the left or use the tags below to select any topic of your interest.
semiotics  learning  academics 
9 weeks ago by folquet
CYGNE NOIR | revue d'exploration sémiotique
Le Cygne noir est une revue évaluée par les pairs ayant pour mission de fournir aux recherches développant une pratique sémiotique un espace de publication exploratoire et scientifique.
journal  semiotics  academics 
9 weeks ago by folquet
Semiotic Review
Semiotic Review, 2013-- (formerly The Semiotic Review of Books, 1990-2012) is a multidisciplinary open-access online peer-reviewed journal publishing review articles as well as original essays. It endeavours to monitor those domains in the Humanities, the Social and the Natural Sciences which bear upon symbolic and communicative behaviour, cognitive systems and processes, cultural transmission and innovations, and the study of information, meaning and signification in all forms.
journal  semiotics  academics 
9 weeks ago by folquet
(PDF) Back to the Future: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act and the Trans-Pacific Partnership
PDF | The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a trade agreement, which seeks to regulate copyright law, intermediary liability, and technological protection measures. The United States Government under President Barack Obama sought to export key features of the Digital Millennium...
tpp  dmca  copyright  trade  law  research  academics 
10 weeks ago by po
Intellectually humble people tend to possess more knowledge, study finds
Rubbishy article and/or study.
Appeals to the "humble bookish intellectual" archetype but it really more about so-called "growth mindset" in appreciating that knowledge isn't fixed and in many cases can be fallible.
knowledge  humility  cognition  epistemology  psychology  research  science  academics 
11 weeks ago by po

« earlier    

related tags

20160815  2019  academia  academic.errors  academic.fraud  admissions  advisers  ai  algorithms  alyssabattistoni  americanstudies  analysis  antoniogramsci  ar  are  arts  balkan  bio  books  brainpickings  burnout  busyness  capitalism  career  careers  christineyano  class  climatechange  cognition  college  collegeadmissions  colleges  communism  computer_science  comrades  conspiracy  copyright  culturalstudies  culture  cv  davidwoodward  debt  democracy  dmca  economics  education  epistemology  equality  everywhere.  failure  failures  fake  family  favorites  fees  firness  funny  games  gender  grants  guidance  healthcare.spending  hegemony  hierarchy  higher  highered  highereducation  history  hn  humility  industry  inequality  infrastructure  instrumentalism  jonathanmills  journal  journals  jovobakić  juliepark  kids  knowledge  labor  language  laniguinier  law  leadership  learning  libraries  literature  living  lottery  machine_learning  margartthatcher  math  mathematics  medicine  mentors  merit  meritocracy  michaelyoung  ml  mylesallen  nadirahfarahfoley  no.fucking.shit.guys  now  obituaries  oer  organizing  paper  parenting  philosophy  podcast  poet  poetry  politics  privilege  profile  programming  psychology  publishing  race  racism  reaganism  recreation  relationality  relationships  research  resume  ronaldreagan  scam  scholarship  school  schooliness  schooling  science  semiotics  serbia  seriously  sitografia  software  startups  stuarthall  students  submittable  taking  tech  thatcherism  them  theories  timeline  tpp  trade  transcontextualism  unions  universities  university  us  usa  utopia  work  writing 

Copy this bookmark: