abortion-contraception-embryo   10

Catholics Similar to Mainstream on Abortion, Stem Cells
The data show that regular churchgoing non-Catholics also have very conservative positions on moral issues. In fact, on most of the issues tested, regular churchgoers who are not Catholic are more conservative (i.e., less likely to find a given practice morally acceptable) than Catholic churchgoers.
news  org:data  poll  data  values  religion  christianity  protestant-catholic  comparison  morality  gender  sex  sexuality  time  density  theos  pro-rata  frequency  demographics  abortion-contraception-embryo  sanctity-degradation 
march 2019 by nhaliday
The Mob Vetoes Ann Coulter | The American Conservative
The idea that the government can shut down speech requiring physical protection has failed court tests in cases involving speech as diverse as Occupy protests and a Christian group bringing a pig’s head to an Islamic arts festival. Both sides in the abortion debate have slapped down the need-to-maintain-public-order argument outside clinics in defense of their right to speak. Any of those situations is at least as volatile as whatever Ann Coulter has been saying publicly since her first book came out in 1998, or Milo Yiannopoulos’ junior-high-school-level homophobic slurs.

The courts have also long held that mobs should not be allowed to exercise the so-called Heckler’s Veto—the practice of shouting down speakers, where whoever can literally “speak” the loudest gets to choose what is said. The natural end of such thinking is mob rule, where Speaker A gets a bigger gang together to shout down the gang Speaker B controls. Or, in Coulter and Yiannopoulos cases, simply threatens to do so.

Allowing a Heckler’s Veto to keep unpopular speakers from expressing their views, as Berkeley and NYU have basically done, does damage far beyond two conservative speakers in 2017. Allowing the veto not only stifles a specific idea, but threatens to chill public discourse generally by discouraging others with controversial ideas from sharing them. Who wants to stand up only to be shouted down by a mob while the administration and law enforcement stand aside?

The Supreme Court has concluded that the government’s responsibility in such circumstances is to control those who threaten or act out disruption, rather than sacrifice the speaker’s free-speech rights. Berkeley and NYU chose a different route.
news  org:mag  right-wing  civil-liberty  law  history  mostly-modern  censorship  current-events  exit-voice  abortion-contraception-embryo 
april 2017 by nhaliday

related tags

age-generation  analysis  announcement  aristos  asia  behavioral-gen  big-peeps  bio  biodet  biotech  bostrom  brands  britain  censorship  china  christianity  civil-liberty  class  comparison  correlation  counterfactual  crime  criminology  crispr  critique  current-events  data-science  data  database  debate  definite-planning  demographics  density  dependence-independence  dimensionality  distribution  economics  enhancement  epidemiology  estimate  ethics  exit-voice  explanation  extrema  fertility  frequency  frontier  futurism  gender  genetic-correlation  genetics  genomics  gwas  gwern  hard-tech  history  hmm  hsu  ideas  idk  innovation  intervention  intricacy  iq  iteration-recursion  law  letters  life-history  literature  macro  medicine  migration  moments  morality  mostly-modern  multi  news  nibble  objektbuch  old-anglo  org:biz  org:data  org:lite  org:mag  org:ngo  org:sci  org:theos  organization  people  poetry  poll  pre-ww2  prediction-markets  prediction  priors-posteriors  pro-rata  protestant-catholic  public-health  quotes  race  reference  religion  replication  rhetoric  right-wing  s:***  sanctity-degradation  scaling-up  scitariat  selection  sex  sexuality  skunkworks  sociology  speedometer  startups  stream  study  systematic-ad-hoc  technology  theos  time  tracker  values  wiki  world-war  🌞  🔬 

Copy this bookmark: