Society   66047

« earlier    

WALSH: We Need More Masculinity In Our Culture, Not Less | Daily Wire
A man becomes an abuser and harasser of women when he rejects that which makes him a man.
society 
15 hours ago by fairyrevel
Your company's Slack is probably sexist
“Already as toddlers, the idea that girls should take others’ feelings and desires into consideration before speaking or acting has formed,” says Herring. “And for boys, conflict isn’t just okay, it’s encouraged.” That’s why men are more likely to make declarative statements (using “boosters” like “always,” “definitely,” and “obviously”) to strengthen their assertiveness, while women often use “hedges” (words like “perhaps,” “might,” and “I think”) to soften statements into suggestions.

In subsequent email and listserv studies, Herring also identified gender differences in message structure: Men would commonly link to a previous message, declare that it’s wrong or disagree, tell the group “how it really is,” and then say (or imply) that the conversation should end. Women, inversely, would thank the previous contributor for her insights, suggest something like, “perhaps we could also think of it this way,” then inclusively appeal to others, asking, “What do the rest of you think?”
¶¶
While incessant communication in digital spaces theoretically permits everyone to avoid interruptions and take as many turns as they like—Slack’s argument for the platform as a democratizing force—the reality isn’t so equitable. Publicly, on average, women don’t take as many turns as men, and their turns are more likely to be offering social support, says Anderson, the workplace communications consultant. “That’s as true online as it is offline. And when women see men taking many turns, being disrespectful, or shutting down a conversation, they’re likely to switch to another channel, where the communication is more collaborative and supportive,” she says.
by:LeahFessler  from:Quartz  feminism  society  SocialMedia  Slack  journalism 
21 hours ago by owenblacker
Sarah Silverman: ‘Jokes I made 15 years ago I'd not make today’ | Stage | The Guardian
I remember Garry Shandling saying in 2007 that when we put people in office who are addicted to money and power, we might as well be giving a bunch of cokeheads a mountain of cocaine and saying: ‘Divide this equally among your people.’
society 
yesterday by lazysoundsystem
More than 24,000 Scots hospitalised because of drinking
50p minimum price per one unit of alcohol, to come into effect March 2018, after years of legal fight against the alc lobby vested interest. (Sugar Tax, ) - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-42066394 - Minimum pricing has been broadly welcomed by health bodies and alcohol awareness groups, who say it will target the kind of drinking that leads to the greatest harm. //
People from the most deprived areas are nearly eight times more likely to need help, according to the NHS. There were 36,235 alcohol-related hospital admissions last year - the equivalent of more than 100 a day. They involved 24,060 individual patients - up from the 35,376 admissions involving 23,656 patients the previous year. Alcohol-related admissions had been falling for almost a decade but the latest figures show there were 685.2 hospital admissions per 100,000 people last year - an annual increase of almost 2%. //&! http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/drink-related-hospital-stays-on-the-rise-1-4619230
NHS  Scotland  Alcohol  minimum  pricing  alcoholism  deprivation  addiction  coping  mechanism  maladaptive  Austerity  poverty  trap  Precariat  binge  drinking  Society  class  Gesellschaft  Sociology  working  poor  Council  childhood  care  Policy  public  health  prevention  sickcare  demand  chronic  sick  population  mental  psychology  psychiatry  depression  aus­sichts­los  hoffnungslos  hopelessness  hopeless  Aussichtslosigkeit  human  condition  humanity  homeless  homelessness  abuse  substance  Opioid  war  on  drugs  tobacco  food–industrial  complex  Sugar  processed  food  lobby  vested  interest  revolving  door  profit  maximisation  obesity  liver  overweight 
yesterday by asterisk2a
alexandre Grothendieck -> une vie digne d'être vécue : nemo : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
J’ai vécu les cinq premières années de ma vie auprès de mes parents et en compagnie de ma sœur, à Berlin. Mes parents étaient athées. Pour eux les...
audio  conference  +grothendieck  science  ecology  society  evolution  ~2h30  archive 
yesterday by emak
Kolakowski on conservatism
"A Conservative Believes:

1. That in human life there never have been and never will be improvements that are not paid for with deteriorations and evils; thus, in considering each project of reform and amelioration, its price has to be assessed. Put another way, innumerable evils are compatible (i.e. we can suffer them comprehensively and simultaneously); but many goods limit or cancel each other, and therefore we will never enjoy them fully at the same time. A society in which there is no equality and no liberty of any kind is perfectly possible, yet a social order combining total equality and freedom is not. The same applies to the compatibility of planning and the principle of autonomy, to security and technical progress. Put yet another way, there is no happy ending in human history.

2. That we do not know the extent to which various traditional forms of social life--families, rituals, nations, religious communities--are indispensable if life in a society is to be tolerable or even possible. There are no grounds for believing that when we destroy these forms, or brand them as irrational, we increase the chance of happiness, peace, security, or freedom. We have no certain knowledge of what might occur if, for example, the monogamous family was abrogated, or if the time-honored custom of burying the dead were to give way to the rational recycling of corpses for industrial purposes. But we would do well to expect the worst.

3. That the idee fixe of the Enlightenment--that envy, vanity, greed, and aggression are all caused by the deficiencies of social institutions and that they will be swept away once these institutions are reformed-- is not only utterly incredible and contrary to all experience, but is highly dangerous. How on earth did all these institutions arise if they were so contrary to the true nature of man? To hope that we can institutionalize brotherhood, love, and altruism is already to have a reliable blueprint for despotism.

A Liberal Believes:

1. That the ancient idea that the purpose of the State is security still remains valid. It remains valid even if the notion of "security" is expanded to include not only the protection of persons and property by means of the law, but also various provisions of insurance: that people should not starve if they are jobless; that the poor should not be condemned to die through lack of medical help; that children should have free access to education--all these are also part of security. Yet security should never be confused with liberty. The State does not guarantee freedom by action and by regulating various areas of life, but by doing nothing. In fact security can be expanded only at the expense of liberty. In any event, to make people happy is not the function of the State.

2. That human communities are threatened not only by stagnation but also by degradation when they are so organized that there is no longer room for individual initiative and inventiveness. The collective suicide of mankind is conceivable, but a permanent human ant-heap is not, for the simple reason that we are not ants.

3. That it is highly improbable that a society in which all forms of competitiveness have been done away with would continue to have the necessary stimuli for creativity and progress. More equaliity is not an end in itself, but only a means. In other words, there is no point to the struggle for more equality if it results only in the leveling down off those who are better off, and not in the raising up of the underprivileged. Perfect equality is a self-defeating ideal.

A Socialist Believes:

1. That societies in which the pursuit of profit is the sole regulator of the productive system are threatened with as grievous--perhaps more grievous--catastrophes as are societies in which the profit motive has been entirely eliminated from the production-regulating forces. There are good reasons why freedom of economic activity should be limited for the sake of security, and why money should not automatically produce more money. But the limitation of freedom should be called precisely that, and should not be called a higher form of freedom.

2. That it is absurd and hypocritical to conclude that, simply because a perfect, conflictless society is impossible, every existing form of inequality is inevitable and all ways of profit-making justified. The kind of conservative anthropological pessimism which led to the astonishing belief that a progressive income tax was an inhuman abomination is just as suspect as the kind of historical optimism on which the Gulag Archipelago was based.

3. That the tendency to subject the economy to important social controls should be encouraged, even though the price to be paid is an increase in bureaucracy. Such controls, however, must be exercised within representative democracy. Thus it is essential to plan institutions that counteract the menace to freedom which is produced by the growth of these very controls.

So far as I can see, this set of regulative ideas is not self-contradictory. And therefore it is possible to be a conservative-liberal-socialist. This is equivalent to saying that those three particular designations are no longer mutually exclusive options."

[via: http://blog.ayjay.org/against-consequentialism/ ]
politics  via:ayjay  conservatism  liberalism  security  socialism  society  philosophy  enlightenment  envy  vanity  greed  aggression  brotherhood  love  altruism  despotism  happiness  peace  freedom  humans  economics  bureaucracy  democracy  pessimism  conflict  leszekkolakowski 
yesterday by robertogreco
Why can we eat 'living' plants but not 'living' animals?
the scripture has heavily instructed in the favor of not eating meat as it includes causing pain to animals please see here. Now, because we can't eat meat, only plant food is left. So to sustain our lives we have to eat plant food anyway.

Now the question is, don't plants feel pain when they are uprooted or their fruits, leaves, vegetables are plucked? Well, may be they do. But in case of plants, the pain, suffering and self identification is certainly less than the animals. So it involves less karma.

Hinduism Stack Exchange | hinduism.stackexchange.com | nov 2017
dharma  dharma-foundation2-details  ethics  food  hinduism  society  type-discussion 
yesterday by tometaxu
What are the order & duties of the children born from intermixing/hybridisation of 4 classes?
First of all, the sons who are born out of proscribed marriages will not belong to any of the 4 castes (varna-s). As there is no 5th caste, they all will belong to the unknown caste or the out-cast.

Hinduism Stack Exchange | hinduism.stackexchange.com | nov 2017
dharma  hinduism  society  type-discussion 
yesterday by tometaxu
The Education of Mark Zuckerberg - The Atlantic
The Facebook founder has discussed "community" more than 150 times in public. A close reading reveals his road map for the platform’s future.
facebook  zuckerberg  longform  politics  society 
yesterday by SimonHurtz

« earlier    

related tags

+grothendieck  2010s  2017  abuse  accessibility  addiction  age  aggression  ai  alcohol  alcoholism  algorithms  alt-right  altruism  america  anthropocene  anthropology  arby's  archive  audio  aussichtslosigkeit  austerity  australia  aus­sichts­los  autoimmune  automation  bame  basicincome  bbc  behaviour  being  bestpractice  betting  beyond84  bias  binge  blockchain  bookies  boy  boys  brand  brexit  britain  brotherhood  bureaucracy  business  by:leahfessler  camille  cancer  capitalism  care  causation  childhood  children  chronic  class  cns  collapse  communication  complex  complexity  condition  conference  conflict  consciousness  conservatism  conservative  consumerism  coping  correlation  council  crime  cryptocurrency  culture  currentevents  customerservice  cvd  data  death  demand  democracy  depression  deprivation  despotism  development  dharma-foundation2-details  dharma  discrimination  disease  documentation  donaldtrump  door  dopamine  drinking  drugs  ecological  ecology  economics  economist  economy  ecosystem  education  enlightenment  environment  environmental  envy  ethics  evolution  exploitation  fa  facebook  fakenews  family  far-right  fast_food  feminism  feminist  finance  fobt  food  food–industrial  freedom  freud  friends  from:quartz  ft  funny  future  gambling  gender-based  gender  gesellschaft  girl  global/intl  goodread  governance  grahamsutherland  graz  greed  gun-regulation  guns  hacking  happiness  harvey  hate  health  hierarchy  hinduism  history  hoffnungslos  homeless  homelessness  homophobia  hopeless  hopelessness  human  humanity  humans  humor  humour  identity  immune  industry  inflammation  institutional  interest  interesting  internet-freedom  internet-power  internet  iq  isolation  japan  job  jordan  journalism  jung  kevin-simler  labour  law  leszekkolakowski  lgbt  liberalism  lifehacker  literature  liver  lobby  log  loneliness  longform  love  maladaptive  manipulation  marx  marxism  masculinity  materialism  maximisation  mechanism  media  men  mental  mentalhealth  mind  minimum  misogyny  mmh  mobile  modernism  money  movement  nature  netflix  neuroscience  nhs  nihilism  nihilist_arbys  nsa  obesity  objectification  ohforfuckssake  on  opioid  overweight  paglia  parecon  paydayloan  peace  pessimism  pet  peterson  philosophy  photography  pick  policy  politics  poor  population  post-industrialism  post-modernism  post-racial  post-truth  post-work  poverty  power  precariat  precriat  presentations  prevention  pricing  privacy  processed  profit  psychiatry  psychology  public  pupils  questions  quora  racism  rassismus  regulation  regulators  relationships  report  research  restaurant  retail  retrotopia  revolving  right-wing  risks  romance  romantic  rossgittins  russia  sad  school  science  scotland  security  selbstdarstellung  self-medication  self-regulation  serotonin  sex  sexism  sexismus  shopping  sick  sickcare  slack  smartphone  social-change  social-justice  social  socialisation  socialism  socialmedia  society  sociology  software  soziologie  speech  stereotypes  stress  study  substance  sugar  superficial  supremacy  sweden  swedish  system  systems-theory  teams  tech  technology  terf  tobacco  toys  transgender  trap  twitter.com  twitter  type-article  type-discussion  uk  united_states  usa  ux  vanity  vested  viafanf  war  weinstein  well-being  well  wellbeing  white  women  work  working  worldaffairs  writing  youth  zivilcourage  zivilgesellschaft  zuckerberg  ~2h30 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: