Journalism   128266

« earlier    

Twitter
RT : Tim Russert - Academy of Achievement | Journalism |393942850
Journalism  from twitter
20 hours ago by heyyouapp
The rise and humiliating fall of Chris Cantwell, Charlottesville’s starring ‘fascist’
Tinder booted him too, Cantwell confirmed in a slur-filled blog post Thursday, explaining that “these [Jews] will stop at nothing.”

Likewise, his YouTube channel, Facebook page and Twitter account have all been deleted as tech companies rush to purge extremists of all kinds from their platforms since Charlottesville.
So there it is. The man who was an HBO-famous swaggering racist Monday had been reduced by the end of the week to broadcasting from an undisclosed location via a Tumblr account and his personal blog.
culture_of_online_life  video  journalism  Race/Immigrants  USA  politics 
yesterday by seatrout
recalibrating your sites – the ANOVA
"Not too long ago, I felt the need to change the stream of personalities and attitudes that were pouring into my head, and it’s been remarkable.

This was really the product of idiosyncratic personal conditions, but it’s ended up being a good intellectual exercise too. I had to rearrange a few things in my digital social life. And concurrently I had realized that my sense of the world was being distorted by the flow of information that was being deposited into my brain via the internet. I hadn’t really lost a sense of what the “other side” thinks politically; I’m still one of those geezers who forces himself to read Reason and the Wall Street Journal op/ed page and, god help me, National Review. But I had definitely lost a sense of the mental lives of people who did not occupy my various weird interests.

What were other people thinking about, at least as far as could be gleaned by what they shared online? What appeared to be a big deal to them and what didn’t? I had lost my sense of social proportion. I couldn’t tell if the things my friends were obsessing about were things that the rest of the world was obsessing about. Talking to IRL friends that don’t post much or at all online helped give me a sense that I was missing something. But I didn’t know what.

No, I had to use the tools available to me to dramatically change the opinions and ideas and attitudes that were coming flowing into my mental life. And it had become clear that, though I have an RSS feed and I peruse certain websites and publications regularly, though I still read lots of books and physical journals and magazines, the opinions I was receiving were coming overwhelmingly through social media. People shared things and commented on what they shared on Facebook and Twitter, they made clear what ideas were permissible and what weren’t on Facebook and Twitter, they defined the shared mental world on Facebook and Twitter. They created a language that, if you weren’t paying attention, looked like the lingua franca. I’m sure there are people out there who can take all of this in with the proper perspective and not allow it to subtly shape your perception of social attitudes writ large. But I can’t.

It’s all particularly disturbing because a lot of what you see and don’t online is the product of algorithms that are blunt instruments at best.

So I set about disconnecting, temporarily, from certain people, groups, publications, and conversations. I found voices that popped up in my feeds a lot and muted them. I unfollowed groups and pages. I looked out for certain markers of status and social belonging and used them as guides for what to avoid. I was less interested in avoiding certain subjects than I was in avoiding certain perspectives, the social frames that we all use to understand the world. The news cycle was what it was; I could not avoid Trump, as wonderful as that sounds. But I could avoid a certain way of looking at Trump, and at the broader world. In particular I wanted to look past what we once called ideology: I wanted to see the ways in which my internet-mediated intellectual life was dominated by assumptions that did not recognize themselves as assumptions, to understand how the perspective that did not understand itself to be a perspective had distorted my vision of the world. I wanted to better see the water in which my school of fish swims.

Now this can be touchy – mutually connecting with people on social media has become a loaded thing in IRL relationships, for better or worse. Luckily both Facebook and Twitter give you ways to not see someone’s posts without them knowing and without severing the connection. Just make a list of people, pages, and publications that you want to take a diet from, and after a month or two of seeing how different things look, go back to following them. (Alternatively: don’t.) Really do it! The tools are there, and you can always revert back. Just keep a record of what you’re doing.

I was prepared for this to result in a markedly different online experience for me, and for it to somewhat change my perception of what “everyone” thinks, of what people are reading, watching, and listening to, etc. But even so, I’ve been floored by how dramatically different the online world looks with a little manipulation of the feeds. A few subjects dropped out entirely; the Twin Peaks reboot went from being everywhere to being nowhere, for example. But what really changed was the affect through which the world was presenting itself to me.

You would not be surprised by what my lenses appear to have been (and still largely to be): very college educated, very left-leaing, very New York, very media-savvy, very middlebrow, and for lack of a better word, very “cool.” That is, the perspective that I had tried to wean myself off of was made up of people whose online self-presentation is ostentatiously ironic, in-joke heavy, filled with cultural references that are designed to hit just the right level of obscurity, and generally oriented towards impressing people through being performatively not impressed by anything. It was made up of people who are passionately invested in not appearing to be passionately invested in anything. It’s a sensibility that you can trace back to Gawker and Spy magazine and much, much further back than that, if you care to.

Perhaps most dramatic was the changes to what – and who – was perceived as a Big Deal. By cutting out a hundred voices or fewer, things and people that everybody talks about became things and people that nobody talks about. The internet is a technology for creating small ponds for us to all be big fish in. But you change your perspective just slightly, move over just an inch, and suddenly you get a sense of just how few people know about you or could possibly care. It’s oddly comforting, to be reminded that even if you enjoy a little internet notoriety, the average person on the street could not care less who you are or what you do. I recommend it.

Of course, there are profound limits to this. My feeds are still dominantly coming from a few overlapping social cultures. Trimming who I’m following hasn’t meant that I’m suddenly connected to more high school dropouts, orthodox Jews, senior citizens, or people who don’t speak English. I would never pretend that this little exercise has given me a truly broad perspective. The point has just been to see how dramatically a few changes to my digital life could alter my perception of “the conversation.” And it’s done that. More than ever, I worry that our sense of shared political assumptions and the perceived immorality of the status quo is the result of systems that exclude a large mass of people, whose opinions will surely matter in the political wars ahead.

I am now adding some of what I cut back in to my digital life. The point was never really to avoid particular publications or people. I like some of what and who I had cut out very much. The point is to remain alive to how arbitrary and idiosyncratic changes in the constant flow of information can alter our perception of the human race. It’s something I intend to do once a year or so, to jolt myself back into understanding how limiting my perspective really is.

Everyone knows, these days, that we’re living in digitally-enabled bubbles. The trouble is that our instincts are naturally to believe that everyone else is in a bubble, or at least that their bubbles are smaller and with thicker walls. But people like me – college educated, living in an urban enclave, at least socially liberal, tuned in to arts and culture news and criticism, possessed of the vocabulary of media and the academy, “savvy” – you face unique temptations in this regard. No, I don’t think that this kind of bubble is the same as someone who only gets their news from InfoWars and Breitbart. But the fact that so many people like me write the professional internet, the fact that the creators of the idioms and attitudes of our newsmedia and cultural industry almost universally come from a very thin slice of the American populace, is genuinely dangerous.

To regain perspective takes effort, and I encourage you all to expend that effort, particularly if you are an academic or journalist. Your world is small, and our world is big."
freddiedeboer  2017  internet  twitter  facebook  filterbubbles  socialmedia  relationships  algorithms  echochambers  academia  journalism  culture  society  diversity  perspective  listening  web  media  feeds 
yesterday by robertogreco
Ethan Zuckerman: Mistrust, Efficacy and the New Civics – a whitepaper for the Knight Foundation | … My heart’s in Accra
The paper I wrote – “Mistrust, efficacy and the new civics: understanding the deep roots of the crisis of faith in journalism” – served two purposes for me. First, it’s a rough outline of the book I’m working on this next year about mistrust and civics, which means I can pretend that I’ve been working on my book this summer. Second, it let me put certain stakes in the ground for my discussion with my friends at Knight. Conversations about mistrust in journalism have a tendency to focus on the uniqueness of the profession and its critical civic role in the US and in other open societies. I wanted to be clear that I think journalism has a great deal in common with other large institutions that are suffering declines in trust. Yes, the press has come under special scrutiny due to President Trump’s decision to demonize and threaten journalists, but I think mistrust in civic institutions is much broader than mistrust in the press.

Because mistrust is broad-based, press-centric solutions to mistrust are likely to fail. This is a broad civic problem, not a problem of fake news, of fact checking or of listening more to our readers. The shape of civics is changing, and while many citizens have lost confidence in existing institutions, others are finding new ways to participate. The path forward for news media is to help readers be effective civic actors. If news organizations can help make citizens feel powerful, like they can make effective civic change, they’ll develop a strength and loyalty they’ve not felt in years.
misinformation  cyberpolitics  ethan_zuckerman  journalism 
2 days ago by osi_info_program

« earlier    

related tags

2015  2016  2017  207  2202  4480  a:molly-knight  a:rachel-nichols  academia  activism  activismmodel  addiction  advertising  advice  advising  advocacy  affect  algorithms  altright  america  americana  analytics  annotation  anthonyloyd  antifa  ap  argument  assignment  attention  attentioneconomy  audience  audio  bias  books  branding  british  broadcasting  business  businessmodels  buzzfeed  capitalism  charlottesville  chickenhawk  children  churnalism  citizenjournalism  cjr  clickbait  climatechange  clinton  cns  college  comics  communication  conference  conflict  contagion  coverage  cpb  crime  crisismanagement  culture  culture_of_online_life  cyberpolitics  d:2017.06.05  data-quality  data  datajournalism  dataviz  db  deception  degrees  democracy  design  digital  digitalcuration  diversity  doctoral  drugs  dv  echochambers  economics  edshift  education  election  email  english  entrepreneurship  ethan_zuckerman  extractives  facebook  fact  fake  fakenews  fascism  favorite  fb  fear  feeds  feminism  filterbubbles  foi  forensics  foxnews  france  freddiedeboer  full-text  funny  future  germany  google  googlememo  graduate  guidelines  harvard  hate  higher  highered  history  housing  howto  hypocrisy  icymi  ideas  ifttt  image  imp  industry  informationforthe  infoviz  internet  interview  interviews  j-school  jobs  jordanpeterson  journalism  journalists  jrmc  kids  labour-movement  lang:fr  law  legal  lie  listening  literature  live  mainstream  majors  manipulation  marketing  mass  mc  media  mediadev  memes  memetics  mikecernovich  millennials  misinformation  mmj  mobile  neoliberalism  news  npr  nyt  nytimes  ohio  online_dating  opendata  p:marie-claire  passwords  pbs  peerreview  perception  personalbranding  perspective  phd  philosophy  photography  podcasting  polarization  police  politics  posttruth  privacy  problems  propaganda  public  publicrelations  publishing  pubmedia  race/immigrants  race  racism  radio  rant  read-later  relationships  reporters  reporting  research  resources  review  risk  rumor  rupertmurdoch  safety  satire  school  science  sciencepublishing  security  sheet  smm  social-media  social-network  social  social_media  socialmedia  society  sports  storytelling  strategy  stream  stressresponse  style  syria  takes  tanzania  tax  teaching  tech  technology  terminology  terrorism  thompson-reuters  threat  tips  toledo+blade  toolbox  training  trump  trust  twitter  two-factorauthentification  uk  usa  utilitarianism  vancouver  venezuela  video  w:3000  war  web  white_hate  words  world  writing  wsj  wtf  zimbabwe 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: