Innovation   98262

« earlier    

Factors influencing adoption of BIM
BIM  Innovation  george  management  levels 
9 hours ago by oliverhilder
Return investment analysis of BIM in construction
BIM  Innovation  george  management  cost  analysis 
9 hours ago by oliverhilder
Six Principles for Making New Things
"I like to find (a) simple solutions (b) to overlooked problems (c) that actually need to be solved, and (d) deliver them as informally as possible, (e) starting with a very crude version 1, then (f) iterating rapidly."
essay  business  innovation  entrepreneur 
12 hours ago by np
Collaborate on complex problems, but only intermittently – Harvard Gazette
Problem-solving techniques take on new twist
HBS Associate Professor Ethan Bernstein sees a number of workplace implications for different collaboration models, including the advantages of alternating independent efforts with group work over a period of time.

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

For best solutions, intermittent collaboration provides the right formula
BY HBS Communications

DATEAugust 15, 2018
The down side to wind power

Bacow: ‘I am delighted to begin’

After the inauguration, the celebration

New faculty: Lauren Williams

Why did Jill Lepore write an epic of U.S. history? It’s a long story

More than a decade after the introduction of the first smartphone, we are awash in always-on technologies — email, instant messaging, social media, Slack, Yammer, and so on. All that connectivity means we are constantly sharing ideas, knowledge, thinking, and answers. Surely that “wisdom of the crowd” is good for problem-solving at work, right?

Not so fast. New research by Harvard Business School (HBS) Associate Professor Ethan Bernstein and colleagues, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) on Aug. 13, suggests that “always on” may not always be effective. Instead, “intermittently on” might be better for complex problem-solving.

Bernstein, Assistant Professor Jesse Shore of the Questrom School of Business at Boston University, and Professor David Lazer of Northeastern University put together and studied a number of three-person groups performing a complex problem-solving task. The members of one set of groups never interacted with each other, solving the problem in complete isolation; members of another set constantly interacted, as we do when equipped with always-on technologies; and members of the third set of groups interacted only intermittently.

From prior research, the researchers anticipated that the groups whose members never interacted would be the most creative, coming up with the largest number of unique solutions — including some of the best and some of the worst — and a high level of variation that sprang from their working alone. In short, they expected the isolated individuals to produce a few fantastic solutions but, as a group, a low average quality of solution due to the variation. That proved to be the case.

The researchers also anticipated that the groups whose members constantly interacted would produce a higher average quality of solution, but fail to find the very best solutions as often. In other words, they expected the constantly interacting groups’ solutions to be less variable but at the cost of being more mediocre. That proved to be the case as well.

But here’s where the researchers found something completely new: Groups whose members interacted only intermittently preserved the best of both worlds, rather than succumbing to the worst. These groups had an average quality of solution that was nearly identical to those groups that interacted constantly, yet they preserved enough variation to find some of the best solutions, too.

Perhaps the most interesting result was that when their interactions were intermittent, the higher performers were able to get even better by learning from the low performers. When high and low performers interacted constantly, the low performers tended to simply copy high performers’ solutions and were in turn generally ignored by the high performers. But when their interactions were intermittent, the low performers’ ideas helped the high performers achieve even better solutions.

Bernstein and his co-authors see a number of workplace implications for these findings, including the advantages of alternating independent efforts with group work over a period of time. In some ways, that’s how work traditionally has been done in organizations — with individuals working alone, then coming together in a meeting, then returning to work alone. But advancing technology has changed those cycles.

“As we replace those sorts of intermittent cycles with always-on technologies, we might be diminishing our capacity to solve problems well,” Bernstein notes.

The researchers see parallels in a number of trends in organizations today. Agile approaches to teamwork have some of this intermittent characteristic, given that they are organized into “sprints,” gatherings of people that focus on a particular problem and last only a short time. Similarly, hackathons are increasingly designed to provide some intermittency of interaction.

Organizations known for their excellence in creativity and brainstorming ideas, such as IDEO, often use a process that has intermittency built in. Even open offices, a concept about which Bernstein has recently completed research, often have both group spaces (booths, meeting rooms) and individual spaces (phone booths, pods) in which interaction can be paused for a period of time.

Given the study’s findings, the researchers conclude that these design-based tools for intermittent rather than constant interaction may be even more important for organizational productivity and performance than previously thought. They warn that the march toward always-on technology — and more and more digital collaboration tools — should not disturb intermittent isolation, lest it keep groups from achieving their best collective solutions to complex problems.

This research was supported by Office of Naval Research Grant G00005072 and funding from the Harvard Business School Division of Research and Faculty Development.
collaboration  creativity  innovation  business 
yesterday by enochko
What is the Manifesto on in & Sectors ? Ask us at HUB Q75 at !…
Cultural  Creative  Innovation  TheArtsPlus18  from twitter_favs
yesterday by verwinv
Microsoft Spills Foldable Andromeda Secrets in New Patent
According to the patent, without this mechanism the display will feel mushy, something that Samsung also pointed out in their own patent for the Galaxy X. Like the Korean mechanism, Microsoft’s patent will hold the screen in place mechanically, making it feel solid rather than getting pushed down by any pressure exerted by your finger or pen.

2019 may very well be the year of the foldable thingamajig, and I’m all for that.
Microsoft  tablet  innovation  gadgetluv 
3 days ago by jasonsamuels
How Vimeo can power live streaming holograms on Vimeo
To live stream 3D information, we must capture and store that 3D information. At first glance, it looks like a difficult problem, but the solution turns out to be quite simple. If you convert depth data into color, what you end up with is a representation that looks similar to thermal imaging. Since it’s just color, we can encode that into a video format. If you combine the color data with the original RGB data, you end up with a video that looks like the GIF below.  
video  innovation  vimeo 
3 days ago by jasonsamuels
Privacy Register: an intentionally simple privacy management system
Privacy Register is a simple privacy management system built on the idea that GDPR privacy registers should be standardised and open.
privacy  GDPR  dataprotection  software  technology  innovation  tools 
3 days ago by corrickwales

« earlier    

related tags

!key  !trends  25  4.0  747  aaa  academic  accessibility  agency  airplane  amazon  analysis  and  apple  apprentissage  ar  archive  area-development-features  around-the-web  atelier  augmentedreality  automation  automotive-industry  automotive  aviation  banking  bees  behavior  benefits  bim  books  booksigning  brain  business  businessculture  caa  cancer  cars  ch3  ch4  china  collaboration  come  company  competition  competitiveness  compliance  computers  corporate_innovation  cost  cpg  creative  creativity  crisis  crypto  cultural  database  databases  dataprotection  demand  design  desjardins  dialogue  digitalhealth  disruption  diversity  dyson  ecommerce  economic-development  economics  emergency  entrepreneur  entrepreneurs  esb6  essay  ethics  europe  explanation  fail  fast  fastcompany  fda  festival  finance  financement  finding  finserv  fintech  florence  flying  franchise  ft  funny  future  gadgetluv  gdpr  george  germany  global  google  harford  head  health  healthcare  healthit  high-tech  hiring  history  hooky  hsk  hurricane  ideas  idée  ifttt  ikea  impactassessment  incubator  innovation-hubs  innovation  insects  instapaper  intelligence  inventory  investing  iot  iphone  journalism  jtbd  labor  leadership  lean  learning  levels  logistics  machine_learning  magazines-newmedia  management  manufacturing  market-driven  matt  media  microsoft  mind  mta  musk  nature  newyorkmag  nfl  nobel  novartis  opensource  organisation  ota  pharma  plateau  play  pocket  podcast  policy  power  powerpoint  presentation  privacy  prize  productdevelopment  productividad  productivity  productmanagement  progress  québec  realestate  reasons  research  retail  risk  robot  robotics  science  scrollytell  singularity  skilled-labor  slides  slovakia  smallgroups  smartcitiesdurham  social  software  south-atlantic  spatial  start-ups  startup  startups  strategy  tablet  taiwan  teamwork  tech  technology  techtransfer  tecnology  telegraph  tenpla  tesla  the  theartsplus18  thinking  this-week-437  this-week-438  to  tools  transit  trends2019  trousse  tv  usa  userresearch  values  video  vimeo  virginia  volvo  vr  web  welcome  work  workforce-development  workforce-training  workforce  workshop  writing  youth  économie 

Copy this bookmark: