Hypocrisy   3479

« earlier    

Twitter
The of knows no bounds.

America is still shaking from his expl…
hypocrisy  from twitter_favs
5 weeks ago by mikeschinkel
Silicon Valley Nannies Are Phone Police for Kids - The New York Times
[This is one of three connected articles:]

"Silicon Valley Nannies Are Phone Police for Kids
Child care contracts now demand that nannies hide phones, tablets, computers and TVs from their charges."
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/26/style/silicon-valley-nannies.html

"The Digital Gap Between Rich and Poor Kids Is Not What We Expected
America’s public schools are still promoting devices with screens — even offering digital-only preschools. The rich are banning screens from class altogether."
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/26/style/digital-divide-screens-schools.html

"A Dark Consensus About Screens and Kids Begins to Emerge in Silicon Valley
“I am convinced the devil lives in our phones.”"
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/26/style/phones-children-silicon-valley.html

[See also:
"What the Times got wrong about kids and phones"
https://www.cjr.org/criticism/times-silicon-valley-kids.php

https://twitter.com/edifiedlistener/status/1058438953299333120
"Now that I've had a chance to read this article [specifically: "The Digital Gap Between Rich and Poor Kids Is Not What We Expected"] and some others related to children and screen time and the wealthy and the poor, I have some thoughts. 1/

First, this article on the unexpected digital divide between rich and poor seems entirely incomplete. There is an early reference to racial differences in screen usage but in the article there are no voices of black or brown folks that I could detect. 2/

We are told a number of things: Wealthy parents are shunning screens in their children's lives, psychologists underscore the addictive nature of screen time on kids, and of course, whatever the short end of the stick is - poor kids get that. 3/

We hear "It could happen that the children of poorer and middle-class parents will be raised by screens," while wealthy kids will perhaps enjoy "wooden toys and the luxury of human interaction." 4/

Think about that and think about the stories that have long been told about poor families, about single parents, about poor parents of color - They aren't as involved in their kids' education, they are too busy working. Familiar stereotypes. 5/

Many of these judgments often don't hold up under scrutiny. So much depends upon who gets to tell those stories and how those stories are marketed, sold and reproduced. 6/

In this particular story about the privilege of being able to withdraw from or reduce screen time, we get to fall back into familiar narratives especially about the poor and non-elite. 7/

Of course those with less will be told after a time by those with much more - "You're doing it wrong." And "My child will be distinguished by the fact that he/she/they is not dependent on a device for entertainment or diversion." 8/

My point is not that I doubt the risks and challenges of excessive screen time for kids and adults. Our dependence on tech *is* a huge social experiment and the outcomes are looking scarier by the day. 9/

I do, however, resist the consistent need of the wealthy elite to seek ways to maintain their distance to the mainstream. To be the ones who tell us what's "hot, or not" - 10/

Chris Anderson points out "“The digital divide was about access to technology, and now that everyone has access, the new digital divide is limiting access to technology,” - 11/

This article and its recent close cousins about spying nannies in SV & more elite parent hand wringing over screen in the NYT feel like their own category of expensive PR work - again allowing SV to set the tone. 12/

It's not really about screens or damage to children's imaginations - it's about maintaining divides, about insuring that we know what the rich do (and must be correct) vs what the rest of us must manage (sad, bad). 13/fin]
siliconvalley  edtech  children  technology  parenting  2018  nelliebowles  addiction  psychology  hypocrisy  digitaldivide  income  inequality  ipads  smartphones  screentime  schools  education  politics  policy  rules  childcare  policing  surveillance  tracking  computers  television  tv  tablets  phones  mobile  teaching  learning  howwelearn  howweteach  anyakamenetz  sherrispelic 
6 weeks ago by robertogreco
Silicon Valley Nannies Are Phone Police for Kids - The New York Times
"From Cupertino to San Francisco, a growing consensus has emerged that screen time is bad for kids. It follows that these parents are now asking nannies to keep phones, tablets, computers and TVs off and hidden at all times. Some are even producing no-phone contracts, which guarantee zero unauthorized screen exposure, for their nannies to sign.

The fear of screens has reached the level of panic in Silicon Valley. Vigilantes now post photos to parenting message boards of possible nannies using cellphones near children. Which is to say, the very people building these glowing hyper-stimulating portals have become increasingly terrified of them."
parenting  technology-is-not-the-solution-for-everything  technology  hypocrisy  children  life 
6 weeks ago by ssam
An Alternative History of Silicon Valley Disruption | WIRED
"Contrary to tech industry sneering, public funds are responsible for a lot of the technology we attribute to Silicon Valley. Mazzucato points out that GPS was funded by the US Navy, touchscreen display was backed by the CIA, both the internet and SIRI were funded by the Pentagon’s DARPA, and Google’s search algorithm was funded by a National Science Foundation grant.

Yet the government reaps few of the rewards. For instance, the same year the government loaned $535 million to solar-power company Solyndra, it also loaned Tesla $465 million. “Taxpayers footed the bill for Solyndra’s losses—yet got hardly any of Tesla’s” gains, she says. Solyndra has become “a byword for the government’s sorry track record when it came to picking winners,” a story that has helped keep regulators at bay, she says."
technology  technology-is-not-the-solution-for-everything  hypocrisy  business  funding 
7 weeks ago by ssam

« earlier    

related tags

2018-05  2018-07  2018-08  2018-10  2018  abortion  acostajim  addiction  admissions  afd  agenda  alt-right  ama  america  amusing  and  antisemitism  anyakamenetz  article  attention  auto-industry  bailouts  barrie_mckenna  batshitcrazy  big  bigotry  blog  book  branding  brett_kavanaugh  brexit  britain  budgets  business  childcare  children  china  christianity  civility  cnn  cocaine  colleges_&_universities  commentary  computers  conditions  congress  conservatism  conservative  conservative_propaganda  conservativism  correctness  corruption  crossborder  culture  dc:creator=bogostian  dctagged  debunk  deficits  democrats  demonisation  devorah-blachor  digitaldivide  discrimination  discussion  dnc  donald  donaldtrump  donations  donors  door  drugs  drumph  economics  edtech  education  election  engagement  equality  essay  evil  expose  far-right  fascism  feminism  food  fox  foxnews  free-speech  fuckyou  funding  funny  general-motors  getting  google  google:android  gop  government-spending  government  harder  hatred  hawaii  health  healthcare  hearings  history  howwelearn  howweteach  hype  hypocrisy  hypocrite  identity  idols  ifttt  ignore  immigration  inclusion  inclusivity  inclusivitywashing  income  inequality  insightful  interesting  internet  interview  ipads  is  islamophobia  israel  ivy_league  jam  journalism  justice  kavanaugh  kindness  labor  language  larry-kudlow  law  learning  legacies  lgbt  liberalhypocrisy  liberals  life  lobby  lobbying  lobbyist  los_angeles  management  manipulation  may  mcsweeneys  media  meme  mental_health  middleeast  migration  military  mobile  music  nails  nasty  needs  nelliebowles  neo_feminism  nicholas_kristof  not_self_aware  obama  obesity  of  offbeat  on  op-ed:  opensource  opinion  organizations  out  palestine  parenting  party  pc_hypocrisy  peace  pedophile  peter-suderman  phones  policing  policy  political  politics  posturing  power  preexisting  prejudice  pronouns  psychology  race  racism  rage  refugees  religion  representation  reproductive-rights  republican_party  republicans  revolving  right-wing  rightwingnutjobs  rudeness  rules  sanantonio  satire  saudi:  saudiarabia  schools  scotus  screentime  seanhannity  sex  sexism  sherrispelic  siliconvalley  sjw  sjws  slavery  smartphones  snowflake  sorting  stunning  sugar  surveillance  syria  tablets  tariffs  teaching  technology-is-not-the-solution-for-everything  technology  television  the  theatlantic  theology_stuff  theresa  this  to  tories  tracking  tragedy  transphobia  transphobic  triciawang  trump  trumpdonald  trump’s  trust  tv  uk  usa  uspoli  video  war  why  women's_studies  women  writing  wtf 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: