Google   543327

« earlier    

Google, Facebook are super monopolies: Roger McNamee • CNBC
Chantel McGee:
<p>Google shareholders won't be fazed by the EU's $2.7bn fine against the company for competition abuses related to its shopping business, Elevation Partners co-founder Roger McNamee told CNBC on Tuesday.

"As a shareholder of Google you're looking at this and saying: 'We won again,'" McNamee said.

The venture capitalist spoke hours after EU regulators fined Google a record 2.4 billion euros ($2.7 billion), ruling that the search-engine giant violated antitrust rules for its online shopping practices.

Google said it will consider appealing the decision to the highest court in Europe.

"Google, Facebook, Amazon are increasingly just super-monopolies, especially Google and Facebook. The share of the markets they operate in is literally on the same scale that Standard Oil had ... more than 100 years ago — with the big differences that their reach is now global, not just within a single country," he said on "Squawk Alley."

The fine is not large enough to change Google's behavior, he added. "The only thing that will change it is regulations that actually say you can or can't do something."</p>
google  antitrust 
yesterday by charlesarthur
With New Browser Tech, Apple Preserves Privacy and Google Preserves Trackers | Electronic Frontier Foundation
Google’s approach contrasts starkly with Apple’s. Apple’s browser, Safari, will use a method called intelligent tracking prevention to prevent tracking by third parties—that is, sites that are rarely visited intentionally but are incorporated on many other sites for advertising purposes—that use cookies and other techniques to track us as we move through the web. Safari will use machine learning in the browser (which means the data never leaves your computer) to learn which cookies represent a tracking threat and disarm them. This approach is similar to that used in EFF’s Privacy Badger, and we are excited to see it in Safari.
apple  google  browser  privacy 
yesterday by neeklamy
The EU's got it all wrong on Google • Adam Smith Institute
Sam Bowman:
<p>bundling or integrating price comparison tools might be good for users who are less tech-savvy and would normally go for a 'trusted' but more expensive retailer. If you don't realise that SkyScanner exists and would normally just go with BA every time, it could be very useful to get Google Flights right up top, showing that Ryanair does what you're looking for much more cheaply.

So it’s not even clear that prioritising Google Shopping results is bad for consumers – it may lead them to be more price-conscious and to shop around between merchants more. Even if it is – because it’s worse than some alternative price comparison site, for example – there is still no case for punishing Google for giving it special prominence. If Google Shopping is worse for consumers then it must be acting as a revenue raiser for Google, and a de facto way of charging for use of Google search (and other free Google products). 

If people can switch between platforms it doesn’t matter that much if, within a platform, there isn’t that much competition. Prioritising a particular shopping search engine is not akin to gouging water users with higher prices because there are alternatives to Google that users can switch to easily. If the overall user experience is made worse by Google Shopping being prioritised, then users will have the option of moving to a search engine like Bing which is perhaps less good as at search but better overall because it does not prioritise a bad shopping tool. Indeed Bing has specifically targeted Google Shopping, which they say is worse than their own tool, to get users to switch. And there is an incentive created for entrepreneurs and large existing rivals of Google like Facebook to create their own, rival platform…

…But the core issue here is whether we need to force competition within software platforms if competition exists between them. Just as Windows users moved to other operating systems (both on mobile with Android and iOS and desktop with Linux and Apple’s OS X), Google users have plenty of alternatives they can switch to if they think that Google’s bundling worsens the platform’s quality enough. </p>


I disagree with this analysis. Comparing the desktop with mobile misrepresents the role search plays; what Google did in Shopping is like Microsoft not only pre-installing Internet Explorer but making it increasingly hard to run alternative browsers even after you'd downloaded and installed them.

The ASI view is much closer to the US view on antitrust: if you can't point right now to a user who has been inconvenienced, then nothing bad has been done. This seems to me a short-term view of competition (which you'd think an organisation using that name would favour).
google  antitrust 
yesterday by charlesarthur

« earlier    

related tags

-  2017  21apples  4480  a/b  abtesting  ads  advertising  ai  alert  alphabet  amazon  amp  analytics  android  annoying  antitrust  app  apple  articles  boilerplate  books  broken  browser  bug  business  calendar  chrome  chromium  cloud  code  competition  content  csv  cyanogen  damage  decision  design  development  diversity  dorks  ec  education  email  enterprise  eu  europe  evernote  exploits  facebook  fine  fix  fonts  food  forum-posts  gdn  gif  gmail  google  googledisplay  googlesheets  gspread  guarantee  hackernews  hardware  headless  hjd  hn  household  housing  html  html5  ifttt  import  iphone  javascript  jrmc  law  legal  lgbtq  links  macbook  machine_learning  marketing  mh  models  money  monopoly  music  networking  news  nexus-s  openweb  ovum  package  pandas  phone  photo  pixel  privacy  productivity  race  racism  ranking  regulation  releaserelated  repair  resource  rss  sample  scalability  scam  scanning  screen  search  seo  setup  sheets  shopping  slack  slashdot  soundcloud  spacing  spotify  ssl  startuop  startups  styling  support  testing  tools  totwitter  training  twitter  type  video  visualization  water  web  webdev  writing  yro 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: