Civilization   2320

« earlier    

Contingent, Not Arbitrary | Truth is contingent on what is, not on what we wish to be true.
A vital attribute of a value system of any kind is that it works. I consider this a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for goodness. A value system, when followed, should contribute to human flourishing and not produce results that violate its core ideals. This is a pragmatic, I-know-it-when-I-see-it definition. I may refine it further if the need arises.

I think that the prevailing Western values fail by this standard. I will not spend much time arguing this; many others have already. If you reject this premise, this blog may not be for you.

I consider old traditions an important source of wisdom: they have proven their worth over centuries of use. Where they agree, we should listen. Where they disagree, we should figure out why. Where modernity departs from tradition, we should be wary of the new.

Tradition has one nagging problem: it was abandoned by the West. How and why did that happen? I consider this a central question. I expect the reasons to be varied and complex. Understanding them seems necessary if we are to fix what may have been broken.

In short, I want to answer these questions:

1. How do values spread and persist? An ideology does no good if no one holds it.
2. Which values do good? Sounding good is worse than useless if it leads to ruin.

The ultimate hope would be to find a way to combine the two. Many have tried and failed. I don’t expect to succeed either, but I hope I’ll manage to clarify the questions.

Morality Should Be Adaptive: http://www.overcomingbias.com/2012/04/morals-should-be-adaptive.html
I agree with this
gnon  todo  blog  stream  religion  christianity  theos  morality  ethics  formal-values  philosophy  truth  is-ought  coordination  cooperate-defect  alignment  tribalism  cohesion  nascent-state  counter-revolution  epistemic  civilization  rot  fertility  intervention  europe  the-great-west-whale  occident  telos-atelos  multi  ratty  hanson  big-picture  society  culture  evolution  competition  🤖  rationality  rhetoric  contrarianism  values  water  embedded-cognition  ideology  deep-materialism  moloch  new-religion  patho-altruism  darwinian  existence  good-evil  memetics  direct-indirect  endogenous-exogenous  tradition  anthropology  cultural-dynamics  farmers-and-foragers  egalitarianism-hierarchy  organizing  institutions  protestant-catholic  enlightenment-renaissance-restoration-reformation  realness  science  empirical  modernity  revolution  inference  parallax  axioms  pragmatic 
8 hours ago by nhaliday
Surveil things, not people – The sideways view
Technology may reach a point where free use of one person’s share of humanity’s resources is enough to easily destroy the world. I think society needs to make significant changes to cope with that scenario.

Mass surveillance is a natural response, and sometimes people think of it as the only response. I find mass surveillance pretty unappealing, but I think we can capture almost all of the value by surveilling things rather than surveilling people. This approach avoids some of the worst problems of mass surveillance; while it still has unattractive features it’s my favorite option so far.

...

The idea
We’ll choose a set of artifacts to surveil and restrict. I’ll call these heavy technology and everything else light technology. Our goal is to restrict as few things as possible, but we want to make sure that someone can’t cause unacceptable destruction with only light technology. By default something is light technology if it can be easily acquired by an individual or small group in 2017, and heavy technology otherwise (though we may need to make some exceptions, e.g. certain biological materials or equipment).

Heavy technology is subject to two rules:

1. You can’t use heavy technology in a way that is unacceptably destructive.
2. You can’t use heavy technology to undermine the machinery that enforces these two rules.

To enforce these rules, all heavy technology is under surveillance, and is situated such that it cannot be unilaterally used by any individual or small group. That is, individuals can own heavy technology, but they cannot have unmonitored physical access to that technology.

...

This proposal does give states a de facto monopoly on heavy technology, and would eventually make armed resistance totally impossible. But it’s already the case that states have a massive advantage in armed conflict, and it seems almost inevitable that progress in AI will make this advantage larger (and enable states to do much more with it). Realistically I’m not convinced this proposal makes things much worse than the default.

This proposal definitely expands regulators’ nominal authority and seems prone to abuses. But amongst candidates for handling a future with cheap and destructive dual-use technology, I feel this is the best of many bad options with respect to the potential for abuse.
ratty  acmtariat  clever-rats  risk  existence  futurism  technology  policy  alt-inst  proposal  government  intel  authoritarianism  orwellian  tricks  leviathan  security  civilization  ai  ai-control  arms  defense  cybernetics  institutions  law  unintended-consequences  civil-liberty  volo-avolo  power  constraint-satisfaction  alignment 
2 days ago by nhaliday
Soren Johnson on challenging the norms of 4X games | Rock, Paper, Shotgun
A quick but interesting look at the fundamentals of 4X games, how they've evolved, and how they might evolve further, with an emphasis on the Civilization series.
design  4x  civilization  soren-johnson 
11 days ago by docprof
» The Game of Everything, Part 1: Making Civilization The Digital Antiquarian
The point was that it led to a fun game that captured the spirit of its subject matter.
civilization  games  history 
12 days ago by soobrosa
Eternity in six hours: intergalactic spreading of intelligent life and sharpening the Fermi paradox
We do this by demonstrating that traveling between galaxies – indeed even launching a colonisation project for the entire reachable universe – is a relatively simple task for a star-spanning civilization, requiring modest amounts of energy and resources. We start by demonstrating that humanity itself could likely accomplish such a colonisation project in the foreseeable future, should we want to, and then demonstrate that there are millions of galaxies that could have reached us by now, using similar methods. This results in a considerable sharpening of the Fermi paradox.
pdf  study  article  essay  anthropic  fermi  space  expansionism  bostrom  ratty  philosophy  xenobio  ideas  threat-modeling  intricacy  time  civilization  🔬  futurism  questions  paradox  risk  physics  engineering  interdisciplinary  frontier  technology  volo-avolo  dirty-hands  ai  automation  robotics  duplication  iteration-recursion  von-neumann  data  scale  magnitude  skunkworks  the-world-is-just-atoms  hard-tech  ems  bio  bits  speedometer  nature  model-organism  mechanics  phys-energy  relativity  electromag  analysis  spock  nitty-gritty  spreading  hanson  street-fighting  speed  gedanken 
21 days ago by nhaliday
Moral Transposition – neocolonial
- Every morality inherently has a doctrine on that which is morally beneficial and that which is morally harmful.
- Under the traditional, absolute, eucivic moral code of Western Civilisation these were termed Good and Evil.
- Under the modern, relative, dyscivic moral code of Progressivism these are called Love and Hate.
- Good and Evil inherently reference the in-group, and seek its growth in absolute capability and glory.  Love and Hate inherently reference the out-group, and seek its relative growth in capability and privilege.
- These combinations form the basis of the Frame through which individuals aligned with those moralities view the world.  They are markedly distinct; although both Good serves the moral directive of absolutely strengthening the in-group and Hate counters the moral directive of relatively weakening the in-group, they do not map to one another. This failure to map, as well as the overloading of terms, is why it is generally (intentionally, perniciously) difficult to discern the differences between the two world views.

You Didn’t Join a Suicide Cult: http://www.righteousdominion.org/2018/04/13/you-didnt-join-a-suicide-cult/
“Thomas Aquinas discusses whether there is an order to charity. Must we love everyone in outward effects equally? Or do we demonstrate love more to our near neighbors than our distant neighbors? His answers: No to the first question, yes to the second.”

...

This is a perfect distillation of the shaming patriotic Christians with a sense of national identity face. It is a very Alinsky tactic whose fourth rule is “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.” It is a tactic that can be applied to any idealistic movement. Now to be fair, my friend is not a disciple of Alinsky, but we have been bathed in Alinsky for at least two generations. Reading the Gospels alone and in a vacuum one could be forgiven coming away with that interpretation of Christ’s teachings. Take for example Luke 6:27-30:

...

Love as Virtue and Vice
Thirdly, Love is a virtue, the greatest, but like all virtues it can be malformed with excessive zeal.

Aristotle taught that virtues were a proper balance of behavior or feeling in a specific sphere. For instance, the sphere of confidence and fear: a proper balance in this sphere would be the virtue of courage. A deficit in this sphere would be cowardice and an excess would be rashness or foolhardiness. We can apply this to the question of charity. Charity in the bible is typically a translation of the Greek word for love. We are taught by Jesus that second only to loving God we are to love our neighbor (which in the Greek means those near you). If we are to view the sphere of love in this context of excess and deficit what would it be?

Selfishness <—- LOVE —-> Enablement

Enablement here is meant in its very modern sense. If we possess this excess of love, we are so selfless and “others focused” that we prioritize the other above all else we value. The pathologies of the target of our enablement are not considered; indeed, in this state of enablement they are even desired. The saying “the squeaky wheel gets the grease” is recast as: “The squeaky wheel gets the grease, BUT if I have nothing squeaking in m y life I’ll make sure to find or create something squeaky to “virtuously” burden myself with”.

Also, in this state of excessive love even those natural and healthy extensions of yourself must be sacrificed to the other. There was one mother I was acquainted with that embodies this excess of love. She had two biological children and anywhere from five to six very troubled adopted/foster kids at a time. She helped many kids out of terrible situations, but in turn her natural children were constantly subject to high levels of stress, drama, and constant babysitting of very troubled children. There was real resentment. In her efforts to help troubled foster children, she sacrificed the well-being of her biological children. Needless to say, her position on the refugee crisis was predictable.
gnon  politics  ideology  morality  vocab  language  universalism-particularism  tribalism  us-them  patho-altruism  altruism  thinking  religion  christianity  n-factor  civilization  nationalism-globalism  migration  theory-of-mind  ascetic  good-evil  sociality  love-hate  janus  multi  cynicism-idealism  kinship  duty  cohesion  charity  history  medieval  big-peeps  philosophy  egalitarianism-hierarchy  absolute-relative  measure  migrant-crisis  analytical-holistic  peace-violence  the-classics  self-interest  virtu  tails  convexity-curvature  equilibrium 
21 days ago by nhaliday
Civilization is all rise and no fall | Rock, Paper, Shotgun
Civilization VI: Rise and Fall wants to solve a problem. That problem is perpetual growth, and it plagues many 4X games. Whether your aim is world conquest or cultural hegemony, victory in Civilization and many of its cohorts depends on domination.
civilization  gamedev  gaming  pocket 
23 days ago by stasm

« earlier    

related tags

+  ***  1996  2009  2016  2017  2018  4x  6  ability-competence  abolitionists  absolute-relative  abundance  academia  accumulation  acmtariat  activism  actualization  additivism  adriennerich  affluence  age-of-discovery  ageism  agency  aggression  agriculture  ai-control  ai  alien-character  alignment  allodium  alt-inst  altruism  america  analysis  analytical-holistic  andreabagnato  anglosphere  anthropic  anthropocene  anthropolgy  anthropology  antidemos  antiquity  aphorism  archaeology  architecture  archives  arete  aristos  arms  art  article  artificialintelligence  ascetic  asia  astrobiology  astronomy  astrophysics  attaq  audacity  audio  authoritarianism  automation  autonomy  aw  aws  axioms  aynrand  bacteria  beauty  benevolence  bias  big-peeps  big-picture  billg  billgates  bio  biotech  bits  blog  bodies  books  bostrom  branches  britain  broad-econ  bushmen  canon  capitalism  carbon  care  catastrophe  change  charity  charlesdarwin  chart  checklists  childhood  children  china  christianity  cities  civ  civ6  civic  civil-liberty  civilization  civilizations  civvi  classic  clever-rats  climate-change  climate  climatechange  coalitions  cocktail  cohesion  collapose  collapse  collections  colonialism  commencementaddresses  commentary  communication  communism  comparison  competition  concept  conceptual-vocab  confluence  conquest-empire  constraint-satisfaction  consumerism  consumption  contracts  contrarianism  convexity-curvature  coolstuff  cooperate-defect  coordination  corporations  corporatism  corruption  cosmology  cost-benefit  counter-revolution  courage  critique  cultural-dynamics  culture  cybernetics  cynicism-idealism  darwinian  data  davidjamesduncan  death  decentralization  decision-making  decision-theory  deep-materialism  defense  deforestation  democracy  demographics  density  deschooling  design  deterrence  dignity  direct-indirect  dirty-hands  discipline  discussion  disease  dispossession  divergence  diversity  domestication  domination  duplication  dust  duty  dystopia  early-modern  earth  ebola  ecology  econ-metrics  economics  econotariat  eden-heaven  eden  education  efficiency  egalitarianism-hierarchy  egalitarianism  egt  electromag  elonmusk  embedded-cognition  embodied  empathy  empirical  ems  encyclopedias  endogenous-exogenous  engineering  england  enlightenment-renaissance-restoration-reformation  entanglement  entertainment  entropy-like  env  environment  envy  epidemics  epistemic  equality  equilibrium  essay  ethics  europe  evolution  excess  existence  expansionism  expert-experience  explanans  exploitation  exploration  externalcontrols  extrasolar  extraterrestrial  farmers-and-foragers  fashion  favorites  feral  fermi  fertility  film  fire  firearms  firstnations  fluid  folklore  food  foreign-lang  formal-values  forms-instances  fossilfuels  fredericjameson  freedom  frontier  fun  funny  future  futurism  gallic  game  gamedev  games  gaming  gandhi  gdp  gedanken  gender-diff  gender  generations  geography  geology  germanic  giants  gibbon  globalwarming  gnon  gnxp  goldilockszone  good-evil  governance  government  greed  grnvilleclark  group-selection  growth-econ  growth  guncontrol  guns  habitablezone  hanson  happiness  hard-tech  hari-seldon  health  heavy-industry  hemenway  history  hiv  hmm  hn-comments  hn  honor  human  humanity  humans  humility  hunter-gatherer  hunter-gatherers  huntergatherer  ideas  identity  ideology  illegibility  illusion  impro  improbablelife  incentives  inclusivity  increase-decrease  indyjohar  inequality  inference  info-dynamics  infrastructure  innovation  insight  institutions  integrity  intel  intelligence  interconnected  interconnectedness  interdependence  interdisciplinary  intervention  intricacy  ipad  iron-age  is-ought  islam  iteration-recursion  james_scott  jamescscott  jamessuzman  janinebanyus  janus  japan  jargon  jealousy  johnlanchester  johnperrybarlow  josiahwedgewood  just-in-case  kalahari  khoisan  kindness  kinship  language  latin-america  law  leadership  lecture  legacy  legal  legibility  letters  leviathan  libertarianism  libraries  lidar  life  links  list  literature  logistics  long-now  long-read  long-short-run  longevity  love-hate  luddite  magnitude  make  male-variability  malthus  manual-for-civilization  manual  maps  marginal-rev  markets  markzuckerberg  mars  martial  maryoliver  math  maxim-gun  maya  meaning  measure  mechanics  medicine  medieval  mediterranean  memetics  mena  mercycorps  mesopotamia  meta:war  migrant-crisis  migration  military  modding  model-organism  models  modernity  moloch  money  monopolies  moonshots  morality  morethanhuman  mostly-modern  motivation  movement  multi  multiplayer  multispecies  n-factor  n  namibia  nascent-state  nationalism-globalism  nature  new-religion  new.yorker  newmedia  news  nietzschean  nihil  nitty-gritty  noblesse-oblige  nomadism  nomads  nuclear  occident  oceans  offense-defense  old-anglo  optimism  order-disorder  org:edu  org:junk  org:mag  org:mat  org:med  org:nat  org:popup  organizing  orient  origins  orwellian  outcome-risk  paleontology  paleoscience  paradox  parallax  parasites-microbiome  patho-altruism  pathogens  patience  paulehrlich  paulhawken  pc  pdf  peace-violence  peace  people  permaculture  personality  phalanges  philosophy  phys-energy  physics  piracy  planning  poast  pocket  podcast  poetry  pol.11  pol.639  policy  polisci  politics  population  poverty  power  power_materials  pragmatic  pre-ww2  prediction  prepping  preprint  primitivism  pro-rata  progressives  proposal  protestant-catholic  prudence  pseudoe  psychology  purpose  q-n-a  qra  questions  quotes  rationality  ratty  readlater  realness  recommendations  reference  refugees  regulation  reinvention  relativity  religion  remkoolhaas  renewal  representation  resources  responsibility  restoration  retrocomputing  review  revolution  rhetoric  risk  ritual  robotics  romans  roots  rot  russia  sapiens  scale  scales  science-anxiety  science  scifi-fantasy  scitariat  seanilling  security  sedentism  self-control  self-interest  seti  settlements  settlercolonialism  sex  sexism  sexuality  short-film  sidmeierscivilization  siliconvalley  simulation  sinosphere  skunkworks  sky  social-capital  social-psych  social-science  social-structure  sociality  society  solarpunk  son  soren-johnson  south  space  spaceexploration  speculation  speculativefiction  speed  speedometer  spiel  spock  spreading  ssc  state  states  statesmen  status  strangers  strategy  stream  street-fighting  study  studying  sulla  summary  survival  sustainability  systemschange  systemsthinking  t-and-cs  tactics  tails  tech  technology  technosolutionism  tedchiang  telos-atelos  temperance  the-classics  the-founding  the-great-west-whale  the-trenches  the-watchers  the-world-is-just-atoms  theory-of-mind  theos  thermo  things  thinking  thomasclarkson  threat-modeling  time  tobyrollo  todo  tools  top-n  track-record  tradeoffs  tradition  transportation  tribalism  tricks  trivia  trust  truth  unintended-consequences  universalism-particularism  universe  unschooling  urban  urbanism  urbanization  us-them  usa  utopia  values  vi  via-cclark  via-irc  video  videogames  violence  virtu  viruses  visualization  vitality  vocab  volo-avolo  von-neumann  vox  vulgar  walter-scheidel  war  water  wealth-of-nations  wealth  west-hunter  western  westminster  wiki  wikipedia  wisdom  work  world-war  world  writing  xenobio  youtube  yvain  zeitgeist  zika  zombies  🌞  🎩  🔬  🤖 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: