Austrian-school 7
Primer » The Cobden Centre
25 days ago by ivanp
Austrian School primers
austrian-school
economics
education
25 days ago by ivanp
David Graeber: On the Invention of Money – Notes on Sex, Adventure, Monomaniacal Sociopathy and the True Function of Economics « naked capitalism
september 2011 by Vaguery
"At this point, it’s easier to understand why economists feel so defensive about challenges to the Myth of Barter, and why they keep telling the same old story even though most of them know it isn’t true. If what they are really describing is not how we ‘naturally’ behave but rather how we are taught to behave by the market—well who, nowadays, is doing most of the actual teaching? Primarily, economists. The question of barter cuts to the heart of not only what an economy is—most economists still insist that an economy is essentially a vast barter system, with money a mere tool (a position all the more peculiar now that the majority of economic transactions in the world have come to consist of playing around with money in one form or another) [10]—but also, the very status of economics: is it a science that describes of how humans actually behave, or prescriptive, a way of informing them how they should? (Remember, sciences generate hypothesis about the world that can be tested against the evidence and changed or abandoned if they don’t prove to predict what’s empirically there.)
Or is economics instead a technique of operating within a world that economists themselves have largely created? Or is it, as it appears for so many of the Austrians, a kind of faith, a revealed Truth embodied in the words of great prophets (such as Von Mises) who must, by definition be correct, and whose theories must be defended whatever empirical reality throws at them—even to the extent of generating imaginary unknown periods of history where something like what was originally described ‘must have’ taken place?"
economics
rationality
conservatism
David-Graeber
anthropology
debt
Austrian-school
takedown
pragmatism-it-ain't
Or is economics instead a technique of operating within a world that economists themselves have largely created? Or is it, as it appears for so many of the Austrians, a kind of faith, a revealed Truth embodied in the words of great prophets (such as Von Mises) who must, by definition be correct, and whose theories must be defended whatever empirical reality throws at them—even to the extent of generating imaginary unknown periods of history where something like what was originally described ‘must have’ taken place?"
september 2011 by Vaguery
The Hangover Theory - By Paul Krugman - Slate Magazine
february 2009 by tsuomela
1998 article about payback and economics.
economics
hangover-theory
explanation
austrian-school
february 2009 by tsuomela
Angry Bear: St. Anselm's Ontology, Normal Science
february 2009 by tsuomela
"I am just saying that you have to understand that like the medieval scholars they are trapped within a fundamentally faith based model that insists that Markets are Perfect. If they have to insert a few epicycles into their theory (or in this case accept the Treasury View) to make it work well that is just the way it is. Nobody said Faith was supposed to be Easy."
economics
markets
capitalism
belief
faith
sociology
austrian-school
february 2009 by tsuomela
Paulson's scheme-financial times
october 2008 by nugent
austrian economics. vindicated
austrian-school
article
economics
financial-crisis
october 2008 by nugent
Copy this bookmark: